By Professor Geoffrey Hinton, the pioneering computer scientist known as the “godfather of artificial intelligence,” has expressed grave concerns about the potential impact of AI on employment and inequality. In an interview with BBC Newsnight, Hinton advocated for the implementation of a universal basic income (UBI) to mitigate the effects of AI-induced job losses.
Hinton, who until recently worked at Google, believes that while AI will undoubtedly increase productivity and wealth, the benefits will disproportionately accrue to the wealthy, leaving those who lose their jobs in a precarious position. “I was consulted by people in Downing Street, and I advised them that universal basic income was a good idea,” he revealed.
The concept of UBI involves the government providing a fixed amount of money to every citizen, regardless of their means. However, critics argue that such a program would be prohibitively expensive and could divert funding away from essential public services without necessarily alleviating poverty. The UK government has stated that there are currently no plans to introduce a UBI.
Hinton’s concerns extend beyond the economic ramifications of AI. He reiterated his belief that AI poses existential threats to humanity, warning that within the next 5 to 20 years, there is a 50% chance that we will have to confront the problem of AI trying to take over. This could lead to an “extinction-level threat” for humans, as AI could potentially evolve to become more intelligent than biological intelligence and develop the motivation to replicate itself and gain control.
The rapid development of AI, coupled with the unwillingness of governments to regulate its military applications, has left Hinton deeply worried. He cited recent examples of AI being used to generate thousands of military targets as the “thin end of the wedge,” expressing particular concern about the prospect of AI autonomously making decisions to kill people.
Hinton suggested that an international agreement, similar to the Geneva Conventions, may be necessary to regulate the military use of AI. However, he cautioned that such a treaty is unlikely to materialize until “very nasty things have happened.”
When asked if the West is engaged in a Manhattan Project-style race with autocracies like Russia and China to develop military AI, Hinton acknowledged that both countries are likely working hard on the technology. While the West is probably still slightly ahead in research, China is investing significant resources to catch up. Hinton emphasized that a prohibition on the military use of AI would be the best solution to this escalating arms race.
As AI continues to advance at an unprecedented pace, the warnings from one of its most influential pioneers serve as a stark reminder of the potential risks and challenges that lie ahead. Policymakers and tech companies alike will need to grapple with the economic, social, and existential implications of AI to ensure that its benefits are shared equitably and its dangers are mitigated.
Credit: BBC
