By In a significant development that has raised eyebrows in East African political circles, Kenyan authorities have deported 36 Ugandan nationals for allegedly engaging in unauthorized political activities in Kisumu, Kenya. The incident, which occurred on Tuesday night, has shed light on the complex interplay of politics and security in the region.
The group, identifying themselves as members of the FDC-Katonga faction, a splinter group of Uganda’s opposition Forum for Democratic Change (FDC), claim they were in Kenya for a week-long leadership training program. However, their presence and activities aroused suspicion among Kenyan security forces, leading to their arrest and subsequent deportation.
Paul Mugisha, an external security officer, provided insight into the circumstances that led to the group’s detention. According to Mugisha, the Kenyan government, in collaboration with Ugandan authorities, became wary of the group’s activities due to their lack of a designated contact person or coordinator in Kenya. This absence of clear leadership and organization raised red flags for Kenyan security officials, who viewed the group’s presence as a potential security threat.
The deportees were handed over to Ugandan authorities at 4:30 PM and assembled at Kololo Independence Grounds in Kampala. From there, they were to be transferred to police custody for further questioning and investigation.
Samuel Makokha Mugeni, who identified himself as the group’s coordinator, offered a different perspective on their activities in Kenya. Mugeni stated that the purpose of their visit was to enhance the leadership capabilities of the FDC-Katonga faction. He explained that the training was initially scheduled for December, prior to the FDC-Katonga delegates’ conference, but was moved forward.
“To improve the leadership of FDC Katonga and close the leadership gap, we sieved a number of people to get more skills in leadership and mobilize others,” Mugeni elaborated. He further claimed that the group had used official documents to enter Kenya legally.
The choice of Kenya as a training ground, according to Mugeni, was due to the need for a “better environment than Uganda” to train young members in leadership skills. The group had selected the Ukweli Pastoral Leadership Centre in Kisumu County as their venue. However, Mugeni alleges that as they were preparing to commence their training, they were surrounded by unidentified individuals, leading to their detention and eventual deportation.
This incident highlights the sensitive nature of cross-border political activities in East Africa. It underscores the vigilance of security forces in monitoring and controlling such activities, especially those involving opposition groups from neighboring countries.
The deportation of these 36 Ugandans, including three women, raises questions about the freedom of movement and political association within the East African Community. It also points to the challenges faced by opposition groups in finding safe spaces for organization and training.
As the deportees undergo further interrogation by Ugandan police, this event is likely to spark discussions about regional politics, security cooperation between East African nations, and the rights of political activists to organize across borders.
The incident serves as a reminder of the delicate balance between national security concerns and political freedoms in the region. It may also have implications for future cross-border political activities and the relationship between Uganda and Kenya, two key players in East African politics.
