By Mexican army forces killed 19 suspected drug cartel gunmen in a controversial engagement that left no military casualties, the Defense Department announced Wednesday, prompting scrutiny over the one-sided death toll reminiscent of past controversial confrontations.
The deadly clash occurred Monday on the outskirts of Culiacan, Sinaloa’s capital, where factional warfare has erupted within the Sinaloa cartel since early September. The incident began after troops detained a high-ranking lieutenant of the “Mayitos” faction, identified only as “El Max,” who serves under imprisoned kingpin Ismael “El Mayo” Zambada.
According to military officials, more than 30 armed assailants subsequently attacked the soldiers, who “acted in self-defense and strict adherence to the rule of law and with full respect for human rights.” While 19 suspects were killed, at least 11 managed to escape. Troops seized a significant arsenal including 17 rifles — among them a .50-caliber sniper rifle — and four machine guns.
The lopsided casualty count has drawn criticism from the ruling Morena party, which has previously condemned similar incidents under past administrations as potential executions or human rights violations. The confrontation marks the most uneven death toll since the controversial 2014 Tlatlaya case, where soldiers killed 22 suspects at a grain warehouse. That incident later faced intense scrutiny after investigators determined up to twelve suspects were executed after surrendering.
The violence stems from internal cartel conflict following allegations that Zambada was kidnapped on July 25 by JoaquĂn Guzmán LĂłpez, son of imprisoned drug lord “El Chapo” Guzman and leader of the rival “Chapitos” faction. Zambada claims Guzmán LĂłpez forced him aboard an aircraft and delivered him to U.S. authorities.
The Defense Department’s emphasis on proper procedure comes as Mexican forces face increased scrutiny over engagement protocols. The Tlatlaya incident resulted in multiple arrests of soldiers on abuse of authority charges, though they were initially freed before being rearrested years later.
The military’s statement stressed adherence to rules of engagement, but the complete absence of military casualties in such a major confrontation has raised questions about the official account of events.
