By The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday denied a request from the state of Missouri to halt Donald Trump’s upcoming sentencing for his conviction in New York on felony charges related to hush money payments. The decision came in response to Missouri’s lawsuit, which argued that the case against Trump infringed upon voters’ rights under the U.S. Constitution as he campaigns for the Republican presidential nomination ahead of the November 5 presidential election.
The Supreme Court’s order was issued without any accompanying opinions, but conservative Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito noted that they would have considered Missouri’s case but ultimately agreed not to grant further relief.
Trump was found guilty in May of falsifying business records to cover up a $130,000 payment to adult film actress Stormy Daniels in exchange for her silence regarding an alleged affair with Trump years prior. Prosecutors argue that this payment was intended to bolster Trump’s chances in the 2016 presidential election, where he defeated Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton.
Trump, currently the leading Republican candidate for the upcoming election, denies having an affair with Daniels and has vowed to appeal his conviction after his sentencing, which is scheduled for September.
Missouri’s Republican Attorney General Andrew Bailey filed a lawsuit on July 3 against New York State, requesting that the Supreme Court postpone Trump’s impending sentencing and the gag order imposed by New York State Judge Juan Merchan.
Bailey’s lawsuit argued that the case against Trump violated the rights of Missouri voters by interfering with their ability to hear from and vote for their preferred candidate, citing the First Amendment. However, the Supreme Court declined to intervene, leaving the sentencing process to proceed as scheduled.
As legal proceedings continue, Trump and his legal team are preparing to challenge the conviction, which could have significant implications for his presidential campaign and legal standing.
Source: Reuters
