Home Blog Page 365

Gambian Ex-Soldier Convicted in U.S. for Torturing Suspected Coup Plotters in 2006

admin
-
0
Gambian Ex-Soldier Convicted in U.S. for Torturing Suspected Coup Plotters in 2006

DENVER, Colorado  — In a landmark international human rights case, a federal jury in Denver on Tuesday convicted Michael Sang Correa, a former Gambian soldier, on all counts related to the torture of political detainees suspected of participating in a failed 2006 coup against longtime Gambian dictator Yahya Jammeh.

Correa, who once served in an elite military unit called the “Junglers” — known for brutal repression and reporting directly to Jammeh — faced charges including five counts of torture and one count of conspiracy to commit torture. The jury’s unanimous verdict comes nearly 20 years after the alleged crimes and represents a rare use of the U.S. extraterritorial torture statute, which permits prosecution of torture committed abroad when the accused is present in the United States.

The trial drew global attention, with survivors traveling from Gambia, Europe, and various U.S. states to testify about the harrowing abuse they endured. Witnesses described gruesome interrogation methods including electrocution, beatings while suspended upside down, suffocation with plastic bags, and burns from cigarettes and heated metal.

Jurors were shown graphic photographic evidence, including scars and injuries sustained by victims. Each survivor was asked to identify and explain the origins of their injuries by marking the photographs — a powerful moment that underscored the horror of the crimes.

“This trial is not only about justice for the individual victims, but also a reckoning with the impunity that surrounded Yahya Jammeh’s reign,” said a human rights observer present in the courtroom.

Correa, who arrived in the United States in 2016 as part of Jammeh’s personal security team, had been living in Denver and working as a day laborer after overstaying his visa following Jammeh’s ouster in 2017. He was indicted in 2020, making his case one of the few instances where a foreign national has been prosecuted in the U.S. for torture committed overseas.

His defense argued that Correa was a low-ranking private within the Junglers, operating under constant fear and the threat of death. They contended that he lacked authority or autonomy and was coerced into participating in the acts of torture.

However, U.S. prosecutors countered that several members of the Junglers had refused to participate in the torture, proving that Correa had agency and choice. His actions, they argued, were not merely passive obedience, but active participation in a system of repression.

Yahya Jammeh, who seized power in a 1994 military coup and ruled Gambia for 22 years, has been accused of widespread human rights abuses — including extrajudicial killings, unlawful detention, torture, and disappearances of critics and political opponents. He fled into exile in Equatorial Guinea after losing the 2016 presidential election and initially refusing to step down.

A Gambian Truth, Reconciliation and Reparations Commission (TRRC) in 2021 documented extensive atrocities during Jammeh’s rule and urged that those responsible be prosecuted, both domestically and internationally. Correa’s trial is the latest in a series of legal actions abroad targeting Jammeh-era officials.

Correa’s conviction adds to a growing number of international prosecutions connected to the Jammeh regime:

  • In Switzerland, Jammeh’s former interior minister was sentenced to 20 years for crimes against humanity in 2023.
  • A German court convicted another ex-Jungler for murder and crimes against humanity, linked to the targeted killings of government critics.

Legal experts have called these trials crucial steps in building international legal precedents for holding perpetrators of state-sponsored torture accountable, especially when domestic justice systems fail.

Correa now awaits sentencing, which could result in a lengthy prison term under U.S. federal law. His conviction is being celebrated by rights groups as a triumph of global justice mechanisms and a warning to perpetrators of human rights abuses that impunity has limits — even across borders.

Kenya Foils Giant Ant Smuggling Plot in Landmark Wildlife Trafficking Case

admin
-
0
Kenya Foils Giant Ant Smuggling Plot in Landmark Wildlife Trafficking Case

NAIROBI, Kenya  — Kenyan wildlife authorities have thwarted a sophisticated international plot to smuggle thousands of live ants, including rare queen specimens of the Messor Cephalotes, out of the country — a case being hailed as a landmark moment in the country’s war against wildlife trafficking and biopiracy.

According to the Kenya Wildlife Service (KWS), four individuals — two Belgian nationals, one Vietnamese citizen, and one Kenyan — were arrested while attempting to smuggle approximately 5,000 queen ants, including from the highly coveted Giant African Harvester Ant species, to buyers in European and Asian exotic pet markets.

The live insects were ingeniously concealed inside modified laboratory test tubes and syringes, designed to sustain them for up to two months and evade detection by airport scanners. Authorities made the arrest at Jomo Kenyatta International Airport, where the suspects were preparing to board an outbound flight.

“Investigations revealed that the test tubes had been custom-engineered to keep the ants alive and undetected during air travel,” the KWS stated, calling the operation “premeditated and well-executed.”

The intercepted ants were packed in 2,244 containers with an estimated street value of 1 million Kenyan shillings (approximately $7,800 USD), according to court records

This marks one of Kenya’s first major cases involving the illegal trafficking of insects, a growing trend in the global exotic pet trade. While typically overshadowed by cases involving elephants, rhinos, and other iconic African animals, the illegal trade in smaller yet ecologically vital species like ants is now emerging as a serious threat.

“These insects are part of Kenya’s genetic resources, and removing them without prior informed consent or benefit-sharing agreements is a direct violation of our laws and international conventions,” the KWS said in a statement. “This unprecedented case signals a shift in trafficking trends — from charismatic megafauna to lesser-known yet ecologically critical species.”

Wildlife crime experts say the Messor Cephalotes — native to Kenya — is especially prized among exotic insect enthusiasts for its size, color, and colony-building behavior.

The four suspects appeared before the Jomo Kenyatta International Airport Court on Tuesday after pleading guilty to charges of illegal possession and trafficking of live wildlife. The court adjourned proceedings until April 23, pending pre-sentencing reports from the KWS, the National Museums of Kenya, and the Probation Department. All four remain in custody.

“We did not come here to break any laws. By accident and stupidity, we did,” said David Lornoy, one of the Belgian defendants, pleading for leniency from the court.

Authorities noted that exporting any native insect species such as the Messor Cephalotes requires a special license from the Kenya Wildlife Service, along with a health certificate. A source within the international ant trade, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the species is highly sought after and hard to legally acquire, making it a target for smugglers.

Exotic insect enthusiasts often keep ant colonies in formicariums — transparent enclosures that allow observation of complex colony behavior. The Messor Cephalotes, known for its distinctive 20–24mm red and black queens, is described by specialist retailer AntsRUs as a “dream species.”

Currently out of stock, AntsRUs lists the price of a single queen at £99.99 ($132.44 USD).

This case also underscores broader concerns about biopiracy — the exploitation of a country’s native flora and fauna without fair compensation or consent. Kenya is one of several African nations pushing for stronger enforcement of access and benefit-sharing (ABS) regulations under the Nagoya Protocol.

As the global demand for exotic pets expands beyond reptiles and mammals to include invertebrates like ants, experts warn that biosecurity, biodiversity, and legal protections must evolve accordingly.

The Kenya Wildlife Service has vowed to pursue similar cases aggressively and to raise public awareness about the environmental and legal risks posed by the illicit insect trade.

“We are committed to defending all of Kenya’s biodiversity — not just the big five,” the KWS emphasized.

Nigeria: Gunmen Kill at Least 40 in Plateau State Attack, President Orders Probe

admin
-
0
Nigeria: Gunmen Kill at Least 40 in Plateau State Attack, President Orders Probe

ABUJA, Nigeria  — A devastating attack by armed gunmen on Sunday night left at least 40 people dead in the Zike community of north-central Nigeria, in what officials and rights groups say is the latest episode in a cycle of violent clashes over land between Muslim herders and Christian farmers.

Nigerian President Bola Tinubu confirmed the death toll in a statement issued Monday, calling the attack “heinous” and extending condolences to the victims’ families. Tinubu announced he has instructed Nigeria’s security forces to conduct a thorough investigation and bring those responsible to justice.

“I have instructed security agencies to thoroughly investigate this crisis and identify those responsible for orchestrating these violent acts,” the president said in a late Monday statement.

The attack occurred in the Bassa Local Government Area of Plateau State, a region long plagued by ethno-religious violence stemming from land disputes between Muslim Fulani herders and predominantly Christian farming communities. Witnesses said the victims, including children and elderly individuals, were caught off guard and unable to escape when the gunmen stormed the community late at night.

“They came at night and started shooting randomly,” said Andy Yakubu, a resident who witnessed the aftermath. “I saw more than 50 bodies. They destroyed and looted homes. We don’t feel safe anymore.” Yakubu added that no arrests have been made.

Rights group Amnesty International condemned the attack, stating that many victims were “taken by surprise and slaughtered in cold blood,” and emphasized that the security presence in the region has failed to prevent or respond to these recurring massacres.

The assault in Zike is part of a growing pattern of attacks in Plateau and neighboring states, where Fulani herders — armed with automatic weapons — have been accused of executing mass killings in a longstanding conflict over access to grazing land and water. The deepening crisis has also exacerbated religious and ethnic tensions, with Christian communities frequently targeted.

Between December 2023 and February 2024 alone, 1,336 people were killed in Plateau State, according to Amnesty International — a statistic that underscores the breakdown of security in the region, despite government pledges and the deployment of additional military units.

Local leaders in the Bassa area expressed frustration over what they see as the government’s failure to curb the violence.

“Since December, at least 75 members of the Irigwe ethnic group have been murdered,” said Samuel Jugo, spokesperson for the Irigwe Development Association. “Sunday night’s killings are provocative, vexing, and completely undeserving of any human community.”

This is not the first time Plateau State has seen such mass killings. In May 2024, armed assailants stormed multiple villages in the region during a similar late-night raid, leaving over 40 people dead. The frequency and brutality of these attacks have left communities traumatized and displaced, as local security forces struggle to respond quickly or prevent future violence.

The ongoing farmer-herder violence is distinct from Nigeria’s better-known security crisis involving Boko Haram, a jihadist group that began its insurgency in 2009. Boko Haram’s primary stronghold is in the country’s northeast, where it continues to fight for the imposition of a radical form of Islamic law. That insurgency has spilled over into Nigeria’s neighbors, but the conflict in Plateau State is rooted in resource competition, ethnic tensions, and decades of unresolved grievances.

As the nation mourns yet another mass killing, civil society organizations and community leaders are calling for a complete overhaul of security operations in central Nigeria — and an end to the impunity with which attackers continue to operate.

The presidency has not yet announced a timeline for the release of investigation findings, and no arrests had been made as of Tuesday morning.

U.S. Army to Control Land on Mexico Border Amid Migrant Detention Concerns

admin
-
0
U.S. Army to Control Land on Mexico Border Amid Migrant Detention Concerns

WASHINGTON  — The Trump administration is moving to transfer control of a stretch of land along the U.S.-Mexico border to the Department of Defense, enabling the U.S. Army to operate the area as part of a military base — a shift that could allow troops to detain individuals, including migrants, according to U.S. officials familiar with the plan.

The land, part of the Roosevelt Reservation — a 60-foot-wide federal strip running along the border from New Mexico to California — has historically been managed by the Department of the Interior. However, a presidential directive issued Friday night mandates the land be reassigned to the Department of Defense, raising significant legal and operational questions.

The move represents the most extensive attempt yet by the Trump administration to leverage military resources for border enforcement, circumventing the Posse Comitatus Act, a longstanding federal law prohibiting active-duty military from engaging in domestic law enforcement activities.

Under the new arrangement, the Army would treat the land as an extension of an existing installation, effectively enabling military personnel to conduct enforcement actions against those who enter the area without authorization. Individuals detained by Army security forces — including migrants crossing the border illegally — would be handed over to local civilian law enforcement agencies, officials said.

A 45-day test period is planned for a section of the Roosevelt Reservation in New Mexico, located near Fort Huachuca, an Army base in Arizona. During this trial, additional fencing and no-trespassing signage will be installed. The intent, officials say, is to evaluate the feasibility of using Army-controlled land to secure the border.

Officials who spoke to the Associated Press on condition of anonymity said the Pentagon is still reviewing the legal and operational implications of the transfer. Despite the ongoing legal review, they confirmed that the administration’s goal is to enable direct military involvement in detaining migrants on the borderland now classified as a military base.

Legal experts warn that the plan is likely to face immediate court challenges. Elizabeth Goitein, a presidential powers expert at the Brennan Center for Justice, said the strategy stretches the limits of legal authority under the military purpose doctrine — a narrow exception to the Posse Comitatus Act allowing domestic military activity if it serves a clear military function.

“This doctrine only applies if law enforcement is incidental to the primary military purpose,” Goitein said. “If the land’s main function is to aid border enforcement, as this transfer clearly suggests, it is highly likely to be struck down in court.”

Until now, military roles at the border have been restricted to support operations — such as constructing barriers, providing logistical assistance, conducting surveillance, and facilitating deportation flights. Some deportation efforts have included transporting detainees to offshore facilities like Guantanamo Bay. Troops have also served as administrative support for U.S. Customs and Border Protection agents but have not carried out direct arrests.

The National Security Council did not respond to requests for comment on the administration’s intentions or the legal risks associated with the transfer.

It remains unclear whether the Army will deploy additional personnel to manage the newly controlled territory. Currently, about 7,100 active-duty service members under federal control are assigned to border support missions, alongside roughly 4,600 National Guard troops under state authority.

The Roosevelt Reservation was originally established in 1907 as a buffer zone to prevent cross-border smuggling and to maintain federal access for monitoring activities. However, the Trump administration’s decision to militarize the corridor could reshape the legal boundaries of military involvement in immigration enforcement.

Critics of the administration’s border policies view the latest development as part of a broader strategy to normalize military engagement in civilian immigration issues, a tactic that has previously drawn opposition from state and local leaders, as well as civil rights groups.

As the trial phase of the land transfer proceeds, legal observers and immigration advocates are preparing for what could become a landmark legal battle over the limits of presidential authority, military jurisdiction, and civil liberties on American soil.

Israel Releases Ahmad Manasra After 9.5-Year Sentence Sparked by 2015 Stabbing Attack

admin
-
0
Israel Releases Ahmad Manasra After 9.5-Year Sentence Sparked by 2015 Stabbing Attack

JERUSALEM  — Israel on Thursday released Ahmad Manasra, a Palestinian who was imprisoned at the age of 13 for his role in a 2015 stabbing attack in Jerusalem. Manasra’s case drew widespread international attention over the years due to his age at the time of arrest and the mental health issues he reportedly developed during his incarceration.

Manasra, now 21, completed his nine-and-a-half-year sentence, according to his attorney Khaled Zabarqa. He was released to his family, though no immediate details were provided about his current health condition. Zabarqa confirmed that Manasra had been suffering from severe mental illness during his time in prison and was undergoing treatment.

In October 2015, Ahmad Manasra and his 15-year-old cousin Hassan carried out a knife attack in Pisgat Ze’ev, a Jewish settlement neighborhood in East Jerusalem. During the attack, Hassan critically wounded a 13-year-old Israeli boy and stabbed an adult Israeli man before being shot and killed by police. Ahmad was seriously injured after being hit by a car while fleeing. He was later beaten by bystanders, and a video of the incident — showing him bleeding and being verbally abused while lying on the street — circulated widely on social media and drew condemnation from rights groups.

Manasra was convicted of attempted murder and labeled a terrorist by Israeli authorities. Despite his young age and later-diagnosed mental illness, Israeli courts consistently rejected requests for early release, including appeals submitted to the country’s Supreme Court. Judges ruled that his terrorism conviction disqualified him from parole eligibility, regardless of age or medical status.

According to his lawyer and family, Manasra’s mental health significantly deteriorated during his detention. He was first placed in solitary confinement in November 2021 following an altercation with another inmate. Reports from that time stated that he was kept in a small isolation cell for 23 hours a day, suffering from hallucinations, paranoia, and insomnia. His condition worsened to the point that he reportedly attempted self-harm.

A physician who visited Manasra when he was 18 diagnosed him with schizophrenia, attributing the illness to the prolonged psychological stress and isolation experienced in prison. Medical professionals warned that continued incarceration could result in permanent psychiatric damage.

Over the years, Manasra was intermittently transferred to the psychiatric ward of another prison, where he was treated with medication, including regular injections to stabilize his condition. Despite the medical assessments and legal efforts, the Israeli judicial system did not grant early release or leniency.

The Israel Prison Service declined to provide specific details about the conditions of Manasra’s confinement but stated that all prisoners are treated in accordance with Israeli and international legal standards. The agency added that any complaints about mistreatment are investigated.

Human rights organizations have long criticized the treatment of Palestinian minors in Israeli custody, and Manasra’s case became emblematic of the issue. Advocacy groups described his imprisonment as a violation of international norms regarding juvenile justice and mental health care in detention.

Since the start of the Israel-Hamas war on October 7, 2023, conditions for Palestinian detainees in Israeli facilities have reportedly worsened. Several prisoners released in recent ceasefire deals appeared malnourished and in poor health, with many being taken directly to medical facilities upon release.

Last month, a Palestinian teenager held without charge in Israeli custody died after collapsing under unclear circumstances, becoming the first minor to die in Israeli detention in recent years.

Ahmad Manasra’s release ends a prolonged and contentious legal and humanitarian saga, but questions remain about the long-term impact of his incarceration on his mental health and future reintegration into society.

 ICE Tackles Venezuelan Man in New Hampshire Courthouse, Transfers Him to Texas

admin
-
0
 ICE Tackles Venezuelan Man in New Hampshire Courthouse, Transfers Him to Texas

NASHUA, N.H.  — A Venezuelan man attending a court hearing in New Hampshire was tackled and arrested by federal immigration agents inside a courthouse in February, in a forceful incident caught on newly released security footage that also shows a bystander being knocked over during the takedown.

Arnuel Marquez Colmenarez, 33, was apprehended by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents on February 20 as he arrived for his arraignment at Nashua Circuit Court. He was facing misdemeanor charges including driving under the influence, operating a vehicle without a license, and failing to provide information following an accident. The charges were filed earlier that month, on February 9.

Court surveillance video shows two ICE agents intercepting Marquez Colmenarez in a courthouse hallway, wrestling him to the ground and restraining him. In the process, an older man walking nearby with the assistance of a cane was also knocked down and landed on his back. The footage, released publicly this week, has added to ongoing concerns about immigration enforcement actions taking place within judicial buildings.

Hudson Police Department Court Liaison Officer Jared Neff, who was on-site at the time, described the scene in an official incident report. Neff wrote that he heard shouting and a loud bang, which he believed was the sound of people falling and struggling on the ground. He assisted ICE agents in subduing Marquez Colmenarez, who he said resisted being handcuffed.

ICE agents informed Neff that they had orders to detain Marquez Colmenarez due to his immigration status. They stated that an attempt had been made to arrest him quietly in an elevator before he allegedly tried to flee. The arrest occurred just before the defendant was scheduled to appear for arraignment on his pending charges. As a result of his failure to appear, a judge issued a bench warrant.

Nashua police later confirmed that the local prosecutor was not informed of the arrest in advance and did not witness the event. The unexpected nature of the arrest and lack of coordination with local legal authorities have raised questions about communication between federal and local agencies during sensitive court procedures.

As of Monday, Marquez Colmenarez remained in federal custody at an ICE detention facility in Texas, according to public immigration records. ICE has not issued a public statement regarding the incident or the circumstances of his transfer.

The incident underscores the return of aggressive immigration enforcement practices under President Donald Trump’s second term. During his first administration, ICE presence in courthouses increased significantly, drawing widespread criticism from state judges, local officials, and immigrant advocacy groups. A 2011 directive that had generally discouraged arrests in “sensitive locations” such as schools, houses of worship, and hospitals was formally repealed, allowing greater flexibility for courthouse operations.

Under current policy, ICE agents are authorized to make arrests in or near courthouses if they have credible information that a targeted noncitizen will be present and if no state or local laws prohibit such actions. The policy change has led to several controversial arrests nationwide.

Just last month in Boston, an ICE agent was held in contempt of court after detaining a man while he was on trial, further intensifying the legal and ethical debate around federal immigration enforcement within judicial spaces.

The arrest of Marquez Colmenarez has drawn renewed scrutiny to the balance between immigration law enforcement and the protection of due process rights for individuals navigating the legal system.

AP Barred from Oval Office Despite Court Order Against Trump Administration

admin
-
0
AP Barred from Oval Office Despite Court Order Against Trump Administration

WASHINGTON  — The White House on Monday barred Associated Press journalists from attending a high-profile Oval Office news conference between President Donald Trump and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, defying a recent federal court order prohibiting retaliation against the AP for its editorial decisions.

The exclusion came despite a ruling that took effect the same day, issued by U.S. District Judge Trevor N. McFadden, which declared the Trump administration could not penalize the AP for refusing to follow an executive order that renamed the Gulf of Mexico the “Gulf of America.” The judge concluded that the government’s actions constituted unconstitutional viewpoint discrimination, reinforcing the news organization’s First Amendment protections. The administration, however, is appealing the decision and argues it is not yet required to implement the ruling while the appeals process is underway.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is scheduled to hold a hearing Thursday to consider the administration’s request to delay the enforcement of the order during the ongoing legal review. Meanwhile, the Associated Press is pushing to regain full access immediately, arguing that the court’s injunction is already in effect and must be followed.

Later the same day, the AP was allowed limited access to another event honoring Ohio State University’s football team on the White House South Lawn. Two AP photographers were admitted, but a text reporter was turned away without explanation, signaling continued restrictions despite the court’s ruling.

Since February, the Trump administration has systematically blocked AP reporters and photographers from accessing key events in the Oval Office and aboard Air Force One. While the AP still maintains some level of access to other events, including regular press briefings conducted by White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, the Oval Office remains off limits. Leavitt is one of three officials named in the AP’s ongoing lawsuit.

The dispute centers on the AP’s editorial decision not to adopt language mandated by President Trump’s executive order, which sought to rename the Gulf of Mexico in government references and publications. Though AP style guidance includes a note referencing the president’s preference, the news organization chose not to implement the renaming in its reports. The federal judge ruled that the administration’s efforts to punish the outlet for that decision infringed on its right to free speech.

Despite this legal victory, AP’s future access to White House events remains uncertain. The court did not explicitly order the administration to reinstate previous privileges, only to stop excluding the AP based on content or viewpoint. The ruling emphasized that the government cannot deny access to journalists simply because it disapproves of their editorial stance.

White House attorneys have responded by arguing that the AP was never guaranteed the level of access it previously enjoyed. In recent court filings, the administration claimed that no news outlet is entitled to perpetual preferential access and that the AP’s expectations are inconsistent with constitutional standards.

In a statement Monday, AP spokesperson Lauren Easton reiterated the organization’s expectation that the White House restore its participation in the press pool, in line with the court’s order. The legal battle is ongoing, with broader implications for press freedom and government transparency.

Indian Billionaire Jeweler Mehul Choksi Arrested in Belgium Over $1.8 Billion Fraud Allegations

admin
-
0
Indian Billionaire Jeweler Mehul Choksi Arrested in Belgium Over $1.8 Billion Fraud Allegations

HARARE, Belgium  – Indian jeweller and businessman Mehul Choksi was arrested in Belgium on Saturday following an extradition request from India, his lawyer said. Choksi, who left India in 2018, faces charges of defrauding one of the country’s largest banks of nearly $1.8 billion, officials allege.

According to lawyer Vijay Aggarwal, Choksi was taken into custody in Belgium and is scheduled to face extradition proceedings. Aggarwal told the BBC on Monday that his client had not yet commented publicly on the case but that his legal team planned to appeal against the detention and contest the extradition on several grounds. He said Choksi is not a flight risk and is currently undergoing cancer treatment. His legal team intends to argue that there is insufficient evidence to support the allegations and that the extradition request is politically motivated, noting that a trial in India may not meet fair trial standards.

Choksi, a high-profile diamond trader and former owner of Gitanjali Gems, is one of two businessmen sought by Indian authorities in connection with a fraud case at Punjab National Bank. His nephew, Nirav Modi, also faces similar allegations and is currently detained in a London prison awaiting extradition to India. Both men have denied any wrongdoing in connection with the allegations that they colluded with employees at a Mumbai branch of Punjab National Bank to obtain fraudulent advances for payments to overseas jewellery suppliers.

The Enforcement Directorate has accused Choksi and Modi of diverting and laundering funds, a case that has drawn considerable attention in both India and abroad. Earlier reports indicated that Choksi was the subject of non-bailable warrants issued by an Indian court in 2018 and 2021, although the timing of the recent arrest in Belgium remains unclear. After leaving India, Choksi reportedly traveled to the United States and later to Antigua, where he obtained citizenship. In 2021, he was arrested in Dominica and deported back to Antigua.

Bengaluru-based entrepreneur Hariprasad SV, who alerted authorities about the alleged scam at Punjab National Bank in 2016, welcomed the news of Choksi’s arrest and stressed the importance of recovering the billions allegedly looted from India.

Indian authorities have not yet commented publicly on Choksi’s arrest but have confirmed that the case is being pursued as part of a broader investigation into alleged bank fraud involving high-profile diamond traders. The case continues to develop as extradition proceedings move forward in Belgium.

Trump Administration Freezes $2 Billion Funding As Harvard Rejects Government Interference

admin
-
0
Trump Administration Freezes $2 Billion Funding As Harvard Rejects Government Interference

HARVARD, Mass.  – Harvard University rejected demands from the Trump administration on Monday to overhaul its campus policies, prompting federal authorities to freeze more than $2 billion in grants and contracts. The administration’s Joint Task Force to Combat Anti-Semitism had issued conditions requiring the university to eliminate diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives, adopt merit-based admissions and hiring practices, and allow third-party audits of campus programs, as well as to restrict the enrollment of international students deemed “hostile to American values.”

In a statement posted on its official social media account and sent via email to its community, Harvard President Alan Garber said the university “will not surrender its independence or relinquish its constitutional rights.” Garber asserted that no private university should be forced to conform to federal mandates that interfere with academic freedom. He described the administration’s requirements as an unprecedented overreach that invades the intellectual life of the institution.

Legal counsel for Harvard has argued that the administration’s conditions circumvent statutory processes established by Congress and violate the university’s First Amendment rights. In a letter to federal officials, Harvard’s lawyers maintained that while the university is committed to combating antisemitism and other forms of bigotry, the government’s demands impose disruptive remedies not supported by evidence or law.

The Trump administration defended its measures as necessary to safeguard federal funding and ensure that taxpayer dollars are not used to support what it considers dangerous racial discrimination or ideological bias. A White House spokesperson said the conditions are designed to hold universities accountable for creating a campus environment that promotes free speech and combats unchecked anti-Semitism.

The funding freeze marks a critical moment in the ongoing debate over federal oversight of higher education. By refusing to comply, Harvard risks significant federal financial support while asserting its longstanding commitment to academic independence. Legal challenges in the coming weeks are expected to determine whether the administration’s actions will set a precedent for future government intervention in the policies of private universities.

Columbia Student Arrested During Citizenship Interview Amidst ICE Crackdown

admin
-
0
Columbia Student Arrested During Citizenship Interview Amidst ICE Crackdown

In a striking incident that has ignited controversy and alarm across academic and immigrant rights circles, Columbia University student Mohsen Mahdawi was arrested by ICE agents during his U.S. citizenship interview in Vermont earlier this week. The Palestinian refugee, who has resided in the United States for over a decade as a lawful permanent resident, was taken into custody outside the USCIS Burlington Field Office while making peace signs with his hands as officers led him away in handcuffs.

Mahdawi, whose arrest was captured on video and has since circulated online, is at the center of a growing legal and political firestorm. His attorneys have filed a habeas corpus petition challenging the government’s attempt to deport him, arguing that his detention is a retaliatory act aimed at silencing his First Amendment-protected political expression. The legal filing asserts that Mahdawi, who has held a green card for ten years, is being targeted for his activism and speech rather than for any legitimate immigration violation.

Born and raised in a refugee camp in the West Bank, Mahdawi fled hardship and instability in pursuit of a safer future in the United States. He arrived in 2014 and later transferred to Columbia University after studying computer science for two years at Lehigh University in Pennsylvania. At Columbia, he has become a prominent voice for Palestinian rights, co-founding the university’s Palestinian Student Union in 2023. The organization, created with fellow student Mahmoud Khalil, aimed to celebrate Palestinian heritage and advocate for human rights in the face of increasing international scrutiny. Khalil was recently deported following a legal battle, and Mahdawi’s legal team fears he is now facing a similar fate.

Mahdawi’s habeas petition states that he stepped back from organizing campus protests in March 2024, but had been a key figure in demonstrations that criticized Israel’s military actions in Gaza. He became publicly visible in December 2023 after appearing in a segment on CBS’s 60 Minutes, where he recounted witnessing an Israeli soldier kill his best friend as a child in the West Bank. He also condemned Hamas’s October 7, 2023, attack on Israel, saying he was horrified by the violence and fearful of the “huge level of revenge” Israel might unleash on Palestinians.

During that same interview, Mahdawi made headlines by forcefully rejecting antisemitism, responding to an incident during a Columbia protest where a participant shouted “death to Jews.” Mahdawi said he was shocked and immediately confronted the individual, telling him, “You don’t represent us.” He emphasized that opposing antisemitism was central to his values and to the Palestinian cause, stating, “The fight for the freedom of Palestine and the fight against anti-Semitism go hand in hand, because injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.”

Now, with his graduation from Columbia University just weeks away, Mahdawi’s future remains in limbo. He is expected to receive his undergraduate degree in May 2025 and has plans to return in the fall to pursue a master’s degree in International Affairs at Columbia’s School of International and Public Affairs. However, the Department of Homeland Security, under the leadership of Marco Rubio, is reportedly using the same legal mechanism to attempt his removal as was used against Khalil.

That mechanism, a Cold War-era clause of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, allows the federal government to deport individuals whose presence is deemed to pose “potentially serious adverse foreign policy consequences.” The statute was cited in Khalil’s deportation order, and Mahdawi’s legal team now fears it may be wielded in the same way to silence another vocal critic of U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East.

His attorneys argue that deporting Mahdawi would expose him to extreme danger. The petition states that, if returned to the West Bank, he would likely face harassment, imprisonment, and torture—conditions that members of his family have already endured. The lawsuit also outlines Mahdawi’s commitment to nonviolence, noting that he served for two years as president of the Columbia University Buddhist Association, where he promoted empathy and peaceful resistance as fundamental values.

As Mahdawi’s case gains national attention, it is increasingly seen as a flashpoint in the Trump administration’s aggressive crackdown on immigration and perceived dissent. Advocates warn that his arrest signals a troubling trend of using immigration enforcement to punish political activism. With the outcome of his legal challenge pending, the case may become a landmark moment in the ongoing battle over civil liberties, academic freedom, and the rights of non-citizens in the United States.

1...364365366...967Page 365 of 967