Home Blog Page 405

European Leaders Rally Behind Zelenskiy After White House Clash With Trump

European leaders quickly voiced support for Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy on Friday after a heated exchange with U.S. President Donald Trump and Vice President JD Vance at the White House exposed deep divisions between Washington and its allies over the war in Ukraine. 

Within hours, prime ministers and presidents across Europe took to social media, expressing solidarity with Kyiv following the tense Oval Office meeting. While they refrained from directly criticizing Trump, their statements underscored a widening rift between the U.S. and Europe on handling Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. 

French President Emmanuel Macron, who met with Trump earlier this week, emphasized unwavering European support for Ukraine. 

“There is an aggressor: Russia. There is a people who are under attack: Ukraine,” Macron wrote on X. “Respect to those who, since the beginning, have been fighting. Because they are fighting for their dignity, their independence, for their children, and for the security of Europe.” 

Zelenskiy had arrived in Washington seeking continued U.S. military support and had been expected to finalize an agreement on Ukraine’s mineral resources. However, after the confrontation with Trump, he left the White House without signing the deal. 

Trump later accused Zelenskiy of showing disrespect and insisted the Ukrainian leader was “not ready for peace.” 

Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk was among the first to express support, telling Ukraine: “You are not alone.” 

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and European Council President Antonio Costa issued a joint statement praising Zelenskiy. 

“Your dignity honors the bravery of the Ukrainian people,” they wrote. “Be strong, be brave, be fearless. You are never alone. We will continue working with you for a just and lasting peace.” 

German Chancellor Olaf Scholz echoed the sentiment, stating, “Nobody wants peace more than the Ukrainians do.” 

The public show of European support contrasts sharply with Trump’s more skeptical stance on Ukraine. His administration has pushed for negotiations with Russia and signaled a reduced U.S. role in the conflict. 

While European leaders have vowed to continue backing Ukraine, the fallout from Zelenskiy’s White House visit raises concerns over future military aid and security assurances from the U.S., potentially leaving Kyiv more dependent on European allies as it continues to resist Russian advances.

Trump-Zelenskiy Clash at White House Strains U.S.-Ukraine Relations Amid Russia War

A high-stakes meeting between Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy and U.S. President Donald Trump ended in a tense confrontation Friday, further straining relations between Kyiv and its most vital wartime ally. 

Zelenskiy, seeking to secure continued U.S. military aid in Ukraine’s ongoing war with Russia, instead faced criticism from Trump and Vice President JD Vance. A U.S. official said the Ukrainian leader was asked to leave the White House after the heated exchange. 

An anticipated U.S.-Ukraine agreement on the joint development of Ukraine’s natural resources remained unsigned, dashing hopes in Kyiv and Europe for stronger ties. 

Trump has signaled a shift toward a softer stance on Russia, alarming European allies and raising concerns about Ukraine’s security. Friday’s dispute was the most public sign of that shift. 

Vance emphasized diplomacy as the path to resolving the war—the largest in Europe since World War II. Zelenskiy, however, argued that Russian President Vladimir Putin could not be trusted in negotiations. “Make no compromises with a killer,” he told Trump. 

Trump, whose team later stated he and Vance were “standing up for Americans,” posted on Truth Social: “I have determined that President Zelenskyy is not ready for peace if America is involved. He can come back when he is ready for peace.” 

Ukraine’s military chief, Oleksandr Syrskyi, reaffirmed that the country’s armed forces stood by Zelenskiy, calling for unity. European leaders, including French President Emmanuel Macron and NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, expressed strong support for Ukraine. 

In Washington, Trump’s handling of the meeting drew mixed reactions from Republicans, while Democrats condemned his approach. 

During the discussion, Trump pressed Zelenskiy on Ukraine’s position, saying, “You don’t have the cards right now. With us, you start having cards.” 

“I’m not playing cards, Mr. President,” Zelenskiy replied. 

Former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev commented on the dispute, calling it a “brutal dressing down” on Telegram. 

Following the confrontation, Trump directed aides to end the meeting, despite the Ukrainian delegation’s desire to continue discussions, a White House official said. 

With tensions high, Ukraine and the U.S. failed to finalize a minerals deal Kyiv hoped would secure continued American backing and help win Republican support for further military aid. 

Trump warned that future U.S. assistance was uncertain. “You’re either going to make a deal, or we’re out. And if we’re out, you’ll fight it out. I don’t think it’s going to be pretty,” he told Zelenskiy. 

Vance accused Zelenskiy of lacking gratitude, stating, “You didn’t say thank you.” 

“I said many times thank you to the American people,” Zelenskiy responded. 

Trump has repeatedly pushed to de-escalate the war, improve relations with Russia, and redirect U.S. funding. “I hope I’m going to be remembered as a peacemaker,” he said. 

Ukraine, still heavily reliant on Western aid, has faced renewed Russian advances after an unsuccessful 2023 counteroffensive. While Kyiv’s forces recaptured significant territory in 2022, Russia continues to push forward. 

Tensions between Trump and Zelenskiy have escalated in recent weeks, with Trump calling the Ukrainian leader a “dictator” and pressuring him to accept the minerals deal. He later distanced himself from the remark. 

The breakdown in talks raises uncertainty over continued U.S. military aid, leaving Ukraine searching for alternative support as Russia’s offensive intensifies.

Violent Clashes Erupt as Greece Marks Train Crash Anniversary with Nationwide Strike

Greek police fired tear gas at demonstrators who hurled petrol bombs in Athens after protests marking the anniversary of the country’s deadliest train disaster turned violent.

Hooded youths threw Molotov cocktails, smashed paving stones and attempted to storm barriers protecting the parliament during confrontations with police in central Athens. Riot officers responded with tear gas and stun grenades to disperse the crowds.

Sky News chief correspondent Stuart Ramsay, reporting from Athens, described “huge crowds” throughout the capital and noted there had been a “sense” that demonstrations might escalate into violence.

Hundreds of thousands participated in rallies across Greece demanding justice two years after the deadly crash that killed 57 people when a passenger train carrying university students collided with a freight train near Tempe in 2023.

“You count profits. We count lives,” protesters chanted, with many carrying black balloons and anti-government banners.

The demonstrations coincided with a general strike that paralyzed transportation nationwide. International and domestic flights were grounded as air traffic controllers joined the work stoppage. Seafarers, train drivers, doctors, lawyers, teachers, and numerous businesses also participated in the widespread shutdown.

Family members of the crash victims led the protests, which have grown into some of the largest demonstrations since Greece’s debt crisis over a decade ago.

“The government hasn’t done anything to get justice,” said Christos Main, 57, a musician attending the Athens rally. “This wasn’t an accident, it was murder.”

Yannis Panagopoulos, president of the General Confederation of Greek Workers, the country’s largest labor union, stated: “The full truth must come to light, and those responsible, no matter how high their position, must be held accountable.”

Public anger has intensified over the conservative government’s perceived inaction after the crash exposed serious deficiencies in Greece’s transportation infrastructure. A report released Thursday concluded that human error, outdated infrastructure, and systemic failures caused the disaster, while safety gaps identified after the crash remain unaddressed.

Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis’s government faces criticism from victims’ families for failing to initiate a parliamentary inquiry into political responsibility. The government denies wrongdoing and maintains that the judiciary should handle the investigation, which remains unfinished.

Mexican Cartel Boss Caro Quintero Appears in US Court Following Mass Extradition

Rafael Caro Quintero, the alleged drug cartel leader who spent nearly three decades in Mexican prison for the murder of a DEA agent, is scheduled for arraignment Friday in U.S. federal court on trafficking charges, according to a source familiar with the case.

Mexico extradited Caro Quintero Thursday alongside 28 other suspected cartel members in the country’s largest such transfer in years. The action comes as U.S. President Donald Trump threatens to impose 25% tariffs on Mexican goods beginning March 4, citing insufficient progress on controlling fentanyl trafficking and migration.

Caro Quintero, 72, co-founder of the once-powerful Guadalajara Cartel, is expected to make his initial court appearance at approximately 10:30 a.m. EST before U.S. Magistrate Judge Robert Levy in Brooklyn.

While the mass extradition primarily included aging gang leaders like Caro Quintero who dominated Mexico’s criminal landscape decades ago, security analysts note some may have continued directing criminal operations from prison. The transfer also included younger figures accused of trafficking significant quantities of fentanyl into the United States.

Caro Quintero served 28 years in Mexican prison after being convicted in the killing of DEA agent Enrique “Kiki” Camarena, one of the most notorious murders in Mexico’s drug wars. He has denied involvement in Camarena’s death and was released in 2013 on a technicality before being recaptured in 2022.

In 2020, Caro Quintero was indicted in Brooklyn federal court on drug trafficking and weapons charges. His story, including the murdered DEA agent, featured prominently in Netflix’s “Narcos: Mexico” series.

Caro Quintero will appear in the same Brooklyn courthouse where Sinaloa cartel leader Joaquin “El Chapo” Guzman was convicted on drug trafficking charges in 2019. Guzman is currently serving a life sentence in a maximum-security Colorado prison.

Vicente Carrillo Fuentes, alleged former leader of the now largely defunct Juarez Cartel, will also appear Friday in Brooklyn federal court. He faces charges of drug trafficking and ordering murders of rival cartel members.

The remaining suspects extradited Thursday face charges in federal courts across multiple states, including Texas, Illinois, California, Arizona, North Carolina, and Washington, D.C.

Meanwhile, Ismael “El Mayo” Zambada, alleged co-founder of the Sinaloa Cartel alongside Guzman, awaits trial on sex trafficking charges in Brooklyn federal court. His attorney recently indicated the septuagenarian would consider pleading guilty if spared the death penalty.

Trump to Sign Executive Order Making English Official U.S. Language, Source Says

President Donald Trump is set to sign an executive order declaring English as the official language of the United States, a source familiar with the matter said Friday. 

The source, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, did not specify a timeline for the signing of the order, which was first reported by *The Wall Street Journal*. 

The United States has never had an official language at the federal level, though the issue has remained contentious in several states. 

The use of Spanish in public life has been a subject of debate for years, particularly in Texas. In 2011, a state senator demanded that an immigrant rights activist speak English rather than his native Spanish during a legislative hearing. The incident reignited discussions about whether Spanish should be spoken in Texas, a state that was historically part of Mexico and, before that, the Spanish Empire. 

The issue remains deeply personal for many older Mexican-American Texans who recall being punished in school during the 1950s for speaking Spanish. 

Trump Walks Back Zelensky ‘Dictator’ Remark Amid Ukraine Peace Talks, “Did I Say That? I Can’t Believe I Said That”

President Donald Trump on Thursday tempered his recent criticism of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, questioning whether he had referred to him as a “dictator” as the U.S. pushes for a negotiated end to the war between Kyiv and Moscow. 

During an Oval Office meeting with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, Trump was asked whether he still believed Zelensky was a dictator. 

“Did I say that? I can’t believe I said that. Next question,” Trump responded. 

He then emphasized his willingness to work with Zelensky, stating, “I think the president and I actually have had a very good relationship. It maybe got a little bit testy because we wanted to have a little bit of what the European nations had.” 

Trump’s remarks came after a social media post last week in which he called Zelensky a “dictator with elections” and accused him of doing a “terrible job.” He also suggested Zelensky was responsible for the war’s outbreak and downplayed his role in potential peace negotiations, saying the Ukrainian leader “has no cards.” 

Trump has frequently claimed that European aid to Ukraine has been in the form of loans, while U.S. assistance has been a financial loss. Starmer, like French President Emmanuel Macron earlier this week, countered by noting that much of Europe’s support for Ukraine has been provided as a “gift.” 

Zelensky is scheduled to visit the White House on Friday as both countries finalize an agreement granting the U.S. access to Ukraine’s critical minerals supply. Proponents of the deal argue that the economic partnership would strengthen American support for Ukraine’s defense against future Russian aggression. 

Monday marked the third anniversary of Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. The attack followed Russia’s demands that Ukraine be barred from joining NATO and came nearly a decade after Russia annexed Crimea in 2014. 

Trump has made ending the war in Ukraine a focal point of his campaign and recently spoke with Russian President Vladimir Putin to initiate ceasefire discussions. He also reiterated his stance that Ukraine’s NATO membership is off the table, stating, “It’s not gonna happen.” 

When asked whether he trusted Putin, Trump responded cautiously. 

“Trust and verify, let’s call it that,” he said. “You have to verify, because you never know what’s going to happen.” 

He added, “I have confidence that if we make a deal, it’s going to hold.”

Judge Orders Trump-Era Memo on Mass Federal Worker Firings to Be Rescinded

A federal judge has ordered the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) to rescind directives from the Trump administration that instructed federal agencies to assess and potentially terminate certain employees. The ruling, issued Thursday by Judge William Alsup of the Northern District of California, declared the directives “illegal” and invalid. 

The order affects a January 20 memo and a February 14 internal email that directed agencies to “promptly determine whether these employees should be retained at the agency.” The ruling does not reinstate any dismissed employees but blocks further terminations based on the directive. 

Alsup instructed OPM to notify the Department of Defense by Friday, ahead of planned probationary terminations, that the firings are invalid. He also scheduled a hearing where acting OPM Director Charles Ezell is expected to testify, though a date has not been set. 

“The Office of Personnel Management does not have any authority whatsoever under any statute in the history of the universe to hire and fire employees within another agency,” Alsup said. “It can hire its own employees, yes. It can fire them. But it cannot order or direct some other agency to do so.” 

The judge also emphasized the significance of probationary employees in the federal workforce. 

“They come in at the low level and work their way up, and that’s how we renew ourselves and reinvent ourselves,” Alsup said. 

Attorneys challenging the directive argued that the government’s position allows for employees to be dismissed at will, contradicting federal employment protections. 

“The government should not operate in secrecy when it comes to wholesale orders to fire so many people,” said Danielle Leonard, an attorney representing the plaintiffs. “Probationary employees and agencies do have obligations before firing probationary employees.” 

A key debate in court centered on whether OPM’s mid-February communication was an “order” or merely a “request” to federal agencies. 

“Something aberrational happens—not just in one agency, but across the government, in many agencies on the same day. Doesn’t that sound like somebody ordered it to happen, as opposed to, ‘Oh, we just got guidance’?” Alsup asked Assistant U.S. Attorney Kelsey Helland, the only government representative at the hearing. 

Helland maintained that OPM did not explicitly order the firings, stating, “Asking is not ordering.” She suggested that affected employees should appeal through the Office of Special Counsel or the Merit Systems Protection Board instead of seeking emergency court intervention. 

Leonard rejected that argument. 

“Are they really contending to this court that all of these federal employees are lying, Your Honor?” she asked. “That’s what counsel is saying. I don’t think it’s credible.” 

The OPM directives could have affected hundreds of thousands of federal workers, according to agency data, though the exact number of employees terminated under the policy remains unclear. 

With the ruling in place, terminations linked to the Trump-era directive are now under scrutiny, and the legal battle over federal employment protections continues.

Thailand Deports Dozens of Uyghurs to China Amid International Outcry 

Thailand has deported at least 40 Uyghurs to China, officials confirmed Thursday, despite warnings from human rights groups that they face possible torture, enforced disappearance, or worse. 

The group, believed to have been flown to China’s Xinjiang region, had spent a decade in a Bangkok immigration detention center. Their deportation marks the first such move by Thailand since 2015, a year that saw global condemnation over similar actions. 

The Thai government has been tight-lipped about the operation, which took place amid serious concerns raised by the United States and the United Nations. Local media reported that trucks with black plastic-covered windows left Bangkok’s main immigration facility in the early hours of Thursday. Hours later, tracking data from Flightradar24 showed an unscheduled China Southern Airlines flight departing Bangkok and landing in Xinjiang. 

Thai authorities later defended the decision, stating that holding the Uyghurs for over a decade was unjust and that no third country—Turkey included—had stepped forward to offer asylum. Eight Uyghurs remain in Thailand, five of whom are serving prison sentences for crimes committed while in detention. 

Thai Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra, who recently visited China, claimed she had received assurances that the deported Uyghurs would be treated well. However, she did not initially confirm that the deportation had taken place. “In any country, actions must adhere to the principles of law, international processes, and human rights,” she told reporters. 

Beijing has avoided acknowledging that the deported individuals were Uyghurs, instead referring to them as “Chinese illegal immigrants” who were repatriated under international law. Chinese state media claimed the group had been manipulated by criminal organizations and had fled China illegally. 

Rights groups and Western governments have accused China of committing crimes against humanity—and possibly genocide—against the Uyghur population in Xinjiang, allegations that Beijing strongly denies. 

The deportation has sparked outrage among international human rights organizations and political leaders. Human Rights Watch warned that the deported Uyghurs face a high risk of torture and indefinite imprisonment. 

“Thailand’s transfer of Uyghur detainees to China constitutes a blatant violation of Thailand’s obligations under domestic and international laws,” said Elaine Pearson, Asia director at Human Rights Watch. She accused Thai officials of breaking assurances that the detainees would not be sent back to China. 

Phil Robertson, director of the Asia Human Rights and Labour Advocates (AHRLA), said the deportations shattered any illusion that the current Thai government was different from its predecessor when it comes to transnational repression. 

Amnesty International called the move “unimaginably cruel,” while U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio condemned Thailand’s actions and urged governments worldwide not to force Uyghurs back to China. “China has committed genocide and crimes against humanity targeting predominantly Muslim Uyghurs and other ethnic and religious minorities in Xinjiang,” Rubio said in a statement. 

The United Nations also expressed deep regret over the deportations. 

There are around 12 million Uyghurs in Xinjiang, where China has been accused of carrying out mass surveillance, detentions, and religious persecution. Uyghurs, who speak a language similar to Turkish, have long viewed themselves as culturally closer to Central Asian nations than to Han Chinese, China’s ethnic majority. 

Over recent decades, Beijing has orchestrated a mass migration of Han Chinese into Xinjiang, allegedly to dilute the Uyghur population. Reports from human rights groups and exiled Uyghurs detail the destruction of mosques, the banning of religious practices, and the targeting of Muslim leaders. 

The fate of the deported Uyghurs remains uncertain, but human rights advocates fear they could face imprisonment, forced labor, or worse upon their return to China.

Plane Crashes Near Manchester, Vermont; Rescuers Struggle to Reach Wreckage 

A plane crashed in a remote, mountainous area west of Manchester, Vermont, on Wednesday, leaving at least three people injured as emergency crews faced harsh conditions while attempting to reach the wreckage. 

The crash occurred near Equinox Mountain, about 20 minutes from Manchester and an hour from Albany, New York. Manchester Town Manager Scott Murphy confirmed the injuries, according to VT Digger. 

Icy and snowy conditions have complicated the rescue mission, making it difficult for crews to access the crash site. Helicopters were deployed to the area, and paramedics prepared to be lowered to assess victims, Fox Weather reported. 

The Rutland City Fire Department received a request for technical rescue support to assist in recovering the crash victims. Meanwhile, a Vermont State Police spokesperson told VT Digger that the agency is “aware of the report” but is not yet involved in the response, with Manchester Police leading efforts on the ground. 

Flight tracking data from Flightradar24 showed the aircraft departed Baltimore around 6 a.m. before its signal stopped west of Manchester at approximately 8:30 a.m. Further details about the crash, including the cause and type of aircraft, have yet to be confirmed. 

The Vermont crash comes amid a series of high-profile aviation incidents that have raised concerns among travelers. 

In January, a collision between a military helicopter and an American Airlines plane resulted in the deaths of 67 passengers and crew members. Footage captured the moment a Black Hawk helicopter struck the aircraft, sending both into the water. 

More recently, on February 25, a Southwest Airlines flight narrowly avoided a collision with a private jet at Chicago Midway Airport. Video footage showed the moment the Boeing 737-800 was forced to pull up abruptly to avoid a Bombardier Challenger 350 that entered the runway without clearance. 

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) confirmed that the private jet was at fault, stating, “The crew of Southwest Airlines Flight 2504 initiated a go-around when a business jet entered the runway without authorization.” The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) classified the event as a “runway incursion” and has launched an investigation. 

Authorities continue to investigate the Vermont crash as emergency responders work to locate and assist survivors. 

Explosions Kill 11 at M23 Rebel Rally in Eastern Congo 

0

A series of explosions killed 11 people and wounded 65 at a rally held by M23 rebels in the eastern Congolese city of Bukavu on Thursday, escalating tensions in the region. Corneille Nangaa, leader of the rebel alliance that includes M23, blamed the government of President Felix Tshisekedi for the attack. 

The Congolese presidency, which has accused neighboring Rwanda of supporting M23, said on X that “several” people were killed and attributed the violence to “a foreign army illegally present on Congolese soil.” Neither side provided evidence for their claims. 

The incident adds to the growing instability in the mineral-rich east of the Democratic Republic of Congo, where multiple armed groups are engaged in conflict, and regional nations are increasingly involved. 

At a press conference, Nangaa claimed the grenades used in the attack were the same type employed by Burundi’s military in Congo. Reuters could not independently verify this assertion. 

Burundi has maintained a military presence in eastern Congo for years, initially targeting Burundian rebels but more recently joining efforts against M23. Burundian army spokesperson Brigadier General Gaspard Baratuza condemned the attack on X, asserting there were no Burundian troops in Bukavu. However, he did not specifically address the allegations regarding the grenades. 

M23 has been advancing across eastern Congo since the start of the year, capturing Bukavu and Goma, the region’s largest city. The rebel group has sought to present itself as a stabilizing force by reopening ports and schools in areas it has seized. 

Witnesses described scenes of panic following the explosions. Residents ran through the streets, some carrying the wounded to safety. 

“A plastic bag was thrown in front of us… We didn’t know what was inside. We were just looking at it. Suddenly, there was an explosion. Poof! We fell to the ground and ran away,” said Musanga Tambwe, who was later treated for injuries at Bukavu’s general hospital. 

A medical source reported that 68 people were receiving treatment for blast wounds. 

Nangaa confirmed that he was unharmed, and other senior members of the rebel alliance remained safe. 

The ongoing conflict in eastern Congo has deep historical roots, tracing back to the aftermath of Rwanda’s 1994 genocide and ongoing battles for control over the region’s vast mineral wealth. 

Congo, the United Nations, and Western governments have long accused Rwanda of backing M23, a claim Rwanda denies. Kigali maintains that its military presence in the region is a response to threats posed by Hutu militias allegedly allied with the Congolese army. 

M23’s recent advances mark the most significant escalation of violence in over a decade, raising fears of deeper regional involvement in the conflict.