Home Blog Page 62

U.S. and Iran End Peace Talks Without Agreement, Blame Each Other for Collapse

0

(AP)-The United States and Iran ended face-to-face talks on Sunday without an agreement to end the war, leaving a fragile two-week ceasefire in doubt as both nations blamed each other for the negotiations’ collapse and provided no clarity about what happens when the truce expires April 22.

U.S. officials characterized the negotiations’ breakdown as resulting from what they described as Iran’s refusal to commit to abandoning its nuclear program, while Iranian officials blamed the United States for the talks’ failure without specifying precise sticking points. Neither side indicated what will occur after the 14-day ceasefire expires Tuesday, though Pakistani mediators urged all parties to maintain the pause in hostilities.

Vice President JD Vance, center, walks up a flight of stairs to meet with Pakistan’s Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif for talks about Iran, Saturday, April 11, 2026, in Islamabad. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin, Pool)

Both nations declared their positions were clear and placed responsibility on the other side, underscoring how little the gap had narrowed throughout the marathon talks that stretched 21 hours. The failure suggests that six weeks of warfare killing thousands and devastating regional economies produced no meaningful shift in either party’s fundamental demands.

“We need to see an affirmative commitment that they will not seek a nuclear weapon, and they will not seek the tools that would enable them to quickly achieve a nuclear weapon,” Vice President JD Vance disclosed after the prolonged negotiations, articulating American demands that Iran abandon enrichment capabilities even for civilian purposes.

Iran’s parliament speaker Mohammad Bagher Qalibaf, who led Iran’s delegation in the negotiations, declared it was time for the United States “to decide whether it can gain our trust or not”—language suggesting Tehran views American credibility as the fundamental obstacle rather than substantive policy disagreements.

Qalibaf did not mention the core disputes in a series of social media posts, though Iranian officials earlier indicated the talks fell apart over two or three key issues, blaming what they characterized as U.S. overreach. The vagueness about specific disagreements may reflect internal Iranian debates about how much to disclose publicly or desire to preserve diplomatic flexibility for potential future negotiations.

Iran has long denied seeking nuclear weapons but has insisted on its right to a civilian nuclear program under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. Experts confirm its stockpile of enriched uranium, though not weapons-grade, is only a short technical step away from levels required for nuclear weapons—a “breakout time” measured in weeks rather than months or years.

Since the United States and Israel launched the war on February 28, it has killed at least 3,000 people in Iran, 2,020 in Lebanon, 23 in Israel, and more than a dozen in Gulf Arab states, while causing lasting damage to infrastructure in half a dozen Middle Eastern countries. The casualty figures illustrate how the conflict has spread far beyond the original combatants to engulf the entire region.

Iran’s grip on the Strait of Hormuz has largely severed the Persian Gulf and its oil and gas exports from the global economy, sending energy prices soaring to levels that threaten recession in petroleum-importing nations. The strait’s closure represents Iran’s most effective leverage in negotiations, demonstrating that despite massive military disadvantages versus American forces, Tehran possesses asymmetric capabilities to inflict economic pain globally.

Pakistani Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar announced his country will attempt to facilitate new dialogue between Iran and the United States in coming days despite the breakdown. “It is imperative that the parties continue to uphold their commitment to cease fire,” Dar emphasized, though he provided no indication either nation had agreed to extend the truce beyond Tuesday.

The deadlock—and Vance’s take-it-or-leave-it proposal that Iran terminate its nuclear program—mirrored February’s nuclear talks in Switzerland that preceded the war. Though President Donald Trump has claimed the subsequent military campaign was designed to compel Iran’s leaders to abandon nuclear ambitions, each side’s positions appeared unchanged in negotiations following six weeks of fighting that killed thousands and devastated regional infrastructure.

There was no confirmation whether negotiations would resume, though Iran indicated openness to continuing dialogue, Iran’s state-run IRNA news agency documented. The willingness to keep talking suggests neither side views complete diplomatic rupture as beneficial despite inability to reach agreement on fundamental issues.

“We have never sought war. But if they try to win what they failed to win on the battlefield through talks, that’s absolutely unacceptable,” 60-year-old Mohammad Bagher Karami declared in downtown Tehran, expressing widespread Iranian sentiment that military pressure should not force concessions that diplomacy alone could not achieve.

The United States and Iran entered talks with sharply different proposals and contrasting assumptions about their leverage to end the war. Before negotiations commenced, the ceasefire was already threatened by deep disagreements and Israel’s continued attacks against Iranian-backed Hezbollah in Lebanon—operations that undermined claims about genuine commitment to peace.

Iran’s 10-point proposal ahead of the talks called for guaranteed war termination and sought control over the Strait of Hormuz. It included ending fighting against Iran’s “regional allies,” explicitly demanding a halt to Israeli strikes on Hezbollah—conditions the United States and Israel rejected as rewarding Iranian regional influence.

In this photo released by the Pakistan Foreign Ministry, Iran’s Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Qalibaf, center right, and Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, center left, are greeted by Pakistan Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar, right, and Army Chief Field Marshal Gen. Asim Munir, left, upon their arrival at Nur Khan airbase in Rawalpindi, Pakistan, Saturday, April 11, 2026. (Pakistan Ministry of Foreign Affairs via AP)









Pakistani officials told The Associated Press in March that the U.S. 15-point proposal included monitoring mechanisms and rollback of Iran’s nuclear program. Speaking on condition of anonymity because they lacked authorization to discuss details, they disclosed it also covered reopening the Strait of Hormuz—the economic pressure point causing most global concern.

Indeed, Iran’s closure of the strait has proved its biggest strategic advantage in the war. Around one-fifth of the world’s traded oil typically passed through on over 100 ships daily before Iran deployed mines and threatened attacks that virtually halted commercial traffic.

During the talks, the U.S. military announced two destroyers transited the critical waterway ahead of mine-clearing work—a first since the war began and signal that America intends reopening the strait regardless of Iranian consent. Iran’s state media, however, denied the country’s joint military command acknowledged the transit, suggesting either the U.S. announcement was false or Iran was concealing American operations.

“We’re sweeping the strait. Whether we make a deal or not makes no difference to me,” Trump declared as talks extended into early Sunday morning, employing language suggesting he views military solutions as equally acceptable as diplomatic agreements.

The impasse raises new questions about fighting in Lebanon that has continued despite ceasefire announcements. Israel pressed ahead with strikes after the truce was declared, maintaining the agreement did not apply to Lebanese operations. Iran and Pakistan claimed otherwise, creating fundamental disagreement about the ceasefire’s scope that doomed it from inception.

Lebanon’s state-run National News Agency confirmed six people were killed Sunday morning in an Israeli strike in Maaroub, a village near the southern coastal city of Tyre. Though Israel’s strikes over Beirut have calmed in recent days, its attacks on southern Lebanon have intensified alongside a ground invasion it renewed after Hezbollah launched rockets toward Israel in the opening days of the Iran war.

Negotiations between Israel and Lebanon are expected to begin Tuesday in Washington, Lebanese President Joseph Aoun’s office disclosed, after Israel’s surprise announcement authorizing talks despite the lack of official relations between the countries. Protests erupted in Beirut Saturday over the planned negotiations that many Lebanese view as capitulation to Israeli demands.

Israel wants Lebanon’s government to assume responsibility for disarming Hezbollah, much like was envisaged in a November 2024 ceasefire that Hezbollah violated within weeks. But the militant group has survived efforts to curb its strength for decades, maintaining popular support among Lebanese Shiite communities and parliamentary representation that makes any government unable to confront it militarily.

The day the Iran ceasefire deal was announced, Israel pounded Beirut with airstrikes, killing more than 300 people in the deadliest day in Lebanon since the war began, according to the country’s Health Ministry. The massive strikes demonstrated Israeli determination to degrade Hezbollah regardless of diplomatic efforts to end the broader regional conflict.

As the April 22 ceasefire deadline approaches, fundamental questions remain about whether either side will resume military operations, whether Pakistan or other mediators can broker renewed negotiations, or whether the conflict will simply continue indefinitely with periodic pauses that neither side genuinely respects.

For civilians across Iran, Lebanon, and Israel who have endured six weeks of bombardment, displacement, and economic hardship, the talks’ failure represents another disappointment in a conflict where diplomatic solutions appear as distant as when fighting commenced. The mounting death toll—exceeding 5,000 across multiple countries—illustrates the human cost of intractable disputes about nuclear programs, regional influence, and strategic waterways that nations prove willing to fight over indefinitely rather than compromise.

The economic consequences extend far beyond the immediate war zone as global oil prices remain elevated, threatening recession in energy-dependent economies and creating political pressures on governments worldwide to either broker peace or accept prolonged disruption to petroleum markets. Whether those economic incentives will eventually force concessions that military pressure cannot remains uncertain.

As Sunday’s failed talks concluded and delegations departed Islamabad without agreement or even clarity about next steps, the most likely outcome appeared to be resumed warfare once the ceasefire expires Tuesday—returning the region to violence that has proven easier to initiate than conclude through either military victory or diplomatic settlement.

Djibouti’s Guelleh Secures 6th Term in Landslide Vote Amid Limited Opposition

0

(AP) — Djibouti President Ismaïl Omar Guelleh has secured a sixth term in office after official results showed he won 97.81% of the vote in Friday’s presidential election, extending more than two decades of leadership in the strategically located Horn of Africa nation.

Election authorities indicated the vote proceeded without major disruptions, while celebrations broke out at the presidential palace, where supporters gathered to congratulate the 78-year-old incumbent on his decisive victory.

Guelleh faced only one challenger, Mohamed Farah Samatar, a former member of the ruling party. Analysts have long suggested that elections in Djibouti offer limited competition, with opposition groups frequently boycotting the process over concerns about political restrictions and lack of transparency.

Guelleh first took office in 1999, succeeding his uncle, Hassan Gouled Aptidon, and has since maintained a firm hold on power. Legislative changes in recent years, including the removal of presidential age limits, have further solidified his ability to remain in office.

Djibouti’s geopolitical importance continues to shape both its domestic and international standing. The country hosts military bases from several global powers, including the United States, China, France and Japan, due to its position along a vital maritime corridor connecting the Red Sea to the Gulf of Aden. Revenue from these bases, along with port services supporting neighboring Ethiopia, remains central to the national economy.

While officials highlighted the orderly nature of the vote, critics argue that the absence of robust political competition raises questions about democratic governance in the country. Opposition leaders have repeatedly pointed to constraints on free expression and political participation, concerns that persist despite the government’s emphasis on stability.

Guelleh’s latest victory reinforces a broader pattern across parts of Africa where long-serving leaders maintain power through dominant-party systems and constitutional adjustments. In Djibouti’s case, stability and strategic alliances have often been prioritized over political pluralism, particularly given the country’s role in global security and trade routes.

The overwhelming margin of victory may strengthen Guelleh’s position internationally, especially with foreign partners reliant on Djibouti’s military and logistical infrastructure. However, the lack of competitive electoral dynamics could deepen scrutiny from democracy advocates and international observers.

Looking ahead, the key challenge for Djibouti lies in balancing its strategic importance with internal political reform. As global attention on governance standards increases, sustained one-party dominance may come under greater pressure, even as the country continues to benefit from its critical geographic location.

Child found locked in van for 9 months in eastern France, malnourished and unable to walk

0

A 9-year-old boy was rescued in eastern France after being confined inside a utility van for months, where he was found severely malnourished and unable to walk, authorities said Saturday.

Police intervened earlier this week in the village of Hagenbach after a neighbor reported hearing what sounded like a child coming from a parked vehicle. Prosecutor Nicolas Heitz said officers forced entry into the van and discovered the boy in distressing conditions.

He was found lying curled up, unclothed and covered by a blanket, surrounded by trash and human waste, the prosecutor said. Officials indicated the child had suffered prolonged neglect and had lost the ability to walk after remaining in a seated position for an extended period. He was taken to a hospital for treatment.

Investigators said the boy had been confined since late 2024. His father, who has been detained, told authorities he kept the child in the vehicle to shield him from being placed in a psychiatric facility at the urging of his partner.

Prosecutors said there was no evidence the boy had a history of mental health issues prior to his disappearance, noting that he had been performing well in school.

The child told investigators he had difficulties with his father’s partner and believed his father felt compelled to isolate him. He also said he had not bathed during the period he was held in the vehicle.

The father is facing preliminary charges including kidnapping, while his partner has been charged with failing to assist a minor in danger and placed under judicial supervision. Authorities said she denied knowing the boy was being held in the van.

Two other children connected to the household — the boy’s sister and the partner’s daughter — have been placed under the care of social services.

Officials are examining whether others were aware of the child’s confinement. Family members and acquaintances told investigators they believed the boy had been transferred to another school or was receiving care at a medical facility.

Authorities have not released the identities of those involved. Residents of the village expressed shock at the discovery, describing the case as deeply disturbing.

The case has drawn attention to gaps in child protection systems, particularly when a child disappears under seemingly plausible explanations such as school transfers or medical placement. The ability of the situation to go undetected for months raises questions about communication between schools, social services and local authorities.

It also underscores the challenges in identifying hidden abuse within private family settings. Without regular oversight or reporting mechanisms triggered by absence from school, vulnerable children can remain isolated for extended periods.

The father’s justification reflects a troubling dynamic in which extreme actions are framed as protective, highlighting the need for accessible mental health and family support services that could prevent such situations from escalating.

From a broader perspective, the case may prompt calls for stricter monitoring of prolonged school absences and improved coordination among institutions responsible for child welfare. Early intervention systems are often the first line of defense, and failures at that stage can have severe consequences, as demonstrated in this incident.

AP

Iran warns it could strike U.S. Navy ships after American vessels pass through Strait of Hormuz

0

(NewYorkPost)-Iran warned it could target U.S. Navy ships entering the Strait of Hormuz after American warships passed through the strategic waterway for the first time since the conflict began, raising tensions as diplomatic talks continue.

Multiple U.S. military vessels, including at least two guided-missile destroyers, transited the strait on Saturday in what officials described as an uncoordinated move. The passage marked a significant development in the standoff over control of the narrow shipping route, a critical artery for global energy supplies.

President Donald Trump appeared to confirm the operation in a series of social media posts, stating that the United States had begun efforts to reopen the route to international shipping. He framed the move as part of a broader effort to ensure the flow of energy supplies to global markets.

Iranian officials responded with warnings that any U.S. naval presence in the strait could be treated as a hostile act. A government spokesperson indicated that Iranian forces had tracked one American destroyer approaching the area and cautioned that further movement could trigger a military response.

Despite the warnings, the U.S. vessels completed their transit without incident. A report by The Wall Street Journal described the operation as a routine freedom-of-navigation mission, adding that the ships were not escorting commercial traffic.

The episode unfolded as U.S. and Iranian representatives met in Pakistan for high-level negotiations aimed at preserving a fragile ceasefire. Iranian officials signaled that military activity in the strait could complicate those discussions, warning that continued U.S. movements might undermine diplomatic progress.

Iran has maintained that control over the waterway is central to any broader agreement, while the United States has insisted on unrestricted access for international shipping. The competing positions have emerged as a key obstacle in ongoing efforts to de-escalate the conflict.

The transit of U.S. warships through the Strait of Hormuz represents a calculated show of force designed to reinforce freedom of navigation while testing Iran’s red lines. By proceeding without coordination, Washington signaled it does not recognize any unilateral restrictions on the waterway, even as negotiations continue.

Iran’s response reflects its reliance on the strait as a strategic lever. Control over the route provides Tehran with significant influence over global energy markets, allowing it to exert pressure far beyond the immediate conflict. The threat to target U.S. vessels, even if not acted upon, underscores the risk of rapid escalation in a confined and heavily trafficked maritime corridor.

The timing is particularly sensitive. With talks underway in Pakistan, both sides appear to be balancing diplomacy with displays of strength. Such parallel strategies can increase leverage at the negotiating table but also heighten the risk of miscalculation, especially in a region where military forces operate in close proximity.

For global markets, the incident highlights the fragility of supply routes that handle a large share of the world’s oil and natural gas. Even limited disruptions or threats can drive price volatility and ripple through international economies.

Ultimately, the episode illustrates how the Strait of Hormuz has become the central pressure point in the conflict. Whether it remains open or becomes a flashpoint for further confrontation may determine the trajectory of both the negotiations and the broader regional stability.

Police fatally shoot knife attacker after subway stabbings injure 3 at Grand Central

0

A man armed with a large knife was shot and killed by police Saturday after he attacked three people in a busy New York City subway station, authorities said.

Officers responded to an emergency call shortly before 10 a.m. at Grand Central Terminal, where they encountered the suspect behaving erratically and holding a weapon. Police Commissioner Jessica Tisch said the man ignored repeated commands to drop the knife and advanced toward officers before he was shot.

“He continued to pose a serious threat after injuring multiple people,” Tisch said at a news briefing, adding that officers attempted to calm the situation before using force.

Authorities identified the suspect as Anthony Griffin, 44. He was taken to Bellevue Hospital, where he was pronounced dead. Officials said he had prior arrests.

Three victims — two men, ages 84 and 65, and a 70-year-old woman — were injured in the attack. Police said their wounds were not believed to be life-threatening, though one man suffered severe cuts to the head and face and another sustained a skull fracture. The woman had a shoulder injury.

Investigators said the suspect first attacked a person on one platform before moving to another area of the station and injuring two more individuals. Transit Chief Joseph Gulotta said early findings suggest the violence was random.

New York Gov. Kathy Hochul praised officers for their swift response, saying they acted quickly to stop the threat as the investigation continues.

Transit officials temporarily suspended some train stops at the station and urged commuters to avoid the area as police secured the scene.

Witness Beau Lardner described hearing loud bangs before seeing crowds rush toward exits. He said the surge of passengers fleeing the platforms was unlike anything he had experienced during years of commuting through the station.

The incident highlights ongoing concerns about safety in one of the nation’s busiest transit systems, even as officials have increased police presence in recent years. While violent crime in the subway remains relatively rare compared to overall ridership, high-profile attacks continue to shape public perception and commuter behavior.

The response by officers reflects a broader shift in policing strategy that emphasizes rapid intervention when a suspect poses an immediate threat. In this case, authorities stressed that de-escalation efforts were attempted before deadly force was used, underscoring the challenges officers face in fast-moving situations involving armed individuals in crowded public spaces.

The apparent randomness of the attack adds to concerns about unpredictability in urban transit environments. Unlike targeted incidents, such acts can heighten anxiety among riders and complicate prevention efforts.

From a policy standpoint, the event may renew debate over mental health services, transit security measures and the balance between enforcement and prevention. Officials have increasingly pointed to the need for coordinated responses that combine policing with social services to address underlying risks before they escalate into violence.

AP

 Vance lands in Pakistan for pivotal U.S.-Iran talks as fragile ceasefire faces mounting pressure

0

U.S. Vice President JD Vance arrived in Pakistan on Saturday to lead high-level negotiations with Iranian officials, marking the first direct engagement between the two sides since the conflict began more than a month ago and testing whether a fragile ceasefire can hold.

The American delegation, which includes special envoy Steve Witkoff and adviser Jared Kushner, is seeking to stabilize a temporary halt in fighting brokered by Shehbaz Sharif’s government and lay the groundwork for a broader peace agreement.

Iranian representatives, led by parliament speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, arrived earlier in the capital. Ghalibaf indicated that meaningful discussions would depend on conditions including a halt to Israeli military actions in Lebanon and the release of frozen Iranian assets.

Tensions remain high despite the ceasefire, with continued exchanges of fire between Israeli forces and Hezbollah fighters along southern Lebanon’s border raising doubts about the agreement’s durability.

President Donald Trump has publicly pressed Iran ahead of the talks, portraying its negotiating position as weak while accusing Tehran of leveraging control over the Strait of Hormuz to influence global energy flows. In social media posts, Trump said the negotiations represent a critical moment for determining whether a lasting deal is possible.

Security across Islamabad was tightened ahead of the meetings, with major roads sealed and residents urged to remain indoors. The usually busy capital appeared largely deserted as authorities implemented sweeping precautions.

Sharif described the negotiations as entering a decisive stage, calling the current moment critical as both sides attempt to transition from a temporary pause in fighting to a more durable settlement.

Before departing Washington, Vance expressed cautious optimism about the talks but warned that the United States would not respond favorably to what he described as insincere engagement.

Meanwhile, diplomatic efforts are expanding beyond the U.S.-Iran channel. The office of Lebanese President Joseph Aoun said direct talks between Israel and Lebanon are expected to begin Tuesday in Washington. The discussions are aimed at ending hostilities involving Hezbollah and addressing long-standing security concerns along the border.

Israel, led by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, has maintained that its operations in Lebanon fall outside the scope of the ceasefire with Iran, a position that has fueled friction and threatened to derail broader peace efforts. Recent airstrikes in Lebanon have caused significant casualties, further complicating negotiations.

At the center of the dispute remains the Strait of Hormuz, a vital shipping route through which a significant portion of the world’s oil supply passes. Iran’s restrictions on traffic through the waterway have disrupted global markets, driving up energy prices and adding urgency to the talks. Only a limited number of vessels have transited the route since the ceasefire took effect, far below normal levels.

The Islamabad talks represent a high-stakes diplomatic effort shaped as much by military leverage as by negotiation strategy. The United States is entering discussions from a position of force, reinforced by military deployments and public messaging from President Trump, while Iran is relying on its control of a critical global energy route to strengthen its hand.

This dynamic creates a delicate balance. While both sides have incentives to avoid renewed conflict, their core demands remain far apart. Iran’s insistence on linking the ceasefire to developments in Lebanon adds a regional dimension that complicates what might otherwise be a bilateral negotiation.

The continued fighting involving Hezbollah underscores the risk that parallel conflicts could undermine diplomatic progress. Even if Washington and Tehran reach a framework, unresolved tensions involving Israel and Lebanon could quickly destabilize any agreement.

Economically, the disruption of shipping through the Strait of Hormuz has already demonstrated how regional conflict can ripple across global markets. Sustained restrictions could intensify inflationary pressures worldwide, making the outcome of these talks significant far beyond the Middle East.

Ultimately, the negotiations in Pakistan may determine whether the current pause in fighting evolves into a lasting settlement or collapses into another phase of escalation. The presence of senior officials from both sides signals the seriousness of the effort, but the competing conditions and ongoing violence suggest the path to peace remains uncertain.

NewYorkPost

Artemis II Crew Returns From Historic Moon Mission With Pacific Ocean Splashdown

0

Artemis II’s astronauts returned from the moon with a dramatic splashdown in the Pacific Ocean on Friday to close out humanity’s first lunar voyage in more than half a century, marking a triumphant milestone in NASA’s effort to establish permanent human presence beyond Earth orbit.

It was a victorious homecoming for the crew of four whose record-breaking lunar flyby revealed not only expansive regions of the moon’s far side—never before witnessed by human eyes—but also a total solar eclipse visible only from their unique vantage point in deep space. Commander Reid Wiseman, pilot Victor Glover, Christina Koch, and Canada’s Jeremy Hansen hit the atmosphere traveling Mach 33—or 33 times the speed of sound—a blistering velocity not experienced since NASA’s Apollo moonshots of the 1960s and 1970s.

Their Orion capsule, christened Integrity, made the plunge on automatic pilot as four astronauts sat helplessly strapped in their seats while computers managed the precise atmospheric entry angles required to prevent the spacecraft from skipping off Earth’s atmosphere like a stone across water or burning up from excessive friction.

The tension in Mission Control mounted as the capsule became engulfed in red-hot plasma during peak heating and entered a planned communication blackout that left ground controllers blind to the crew’s status. All eyes focused on the capsule’s life-protecting heat shield that had to withstand thousands of degrees during reentry—a critical test given concerns about its performance.

On the spacecraft’s only previous test flight in 2022 with no crew aboard, the shield’s charred exterior returned looking as pockmarked as the moon itself, raising questions about whether modifications would be required before risking human lives. The successful performance of the heat shield during Artemis II’s reentry validates the design for future missions carrying astronauts to lunar surface.

Like so many others, lead flight director Jeff Radigan anticipated feeling some of that “irrational fear that is human nature,” especially during the six-minute blackout that preceded the opening of the parachutes. The recovery ship USS John P. Murtha awaited the crew’s arrival off the San Diego coast, along with a squadron of military planes and helicopters positioned to provide assistance if the landing went awry.

The last time NASA and the Defense Department collaborated for a lunar crew’s reentry was Apollo 17 in 1972—making the Artemis II recovery the first such operation in 53 years and requiring relearning of procedures and capabilities that had atrophied during decades of low-Earth orbit operations aboard space shuttles and the International Space Station.

Artemis II was projected to come screaming back at 36,170 feet per second—equivalent to 24,661 miles per hour—just shy of the record before slowing to a 19 mph splashdown through a carefully choreographed sequence of parachute deployments. “A perfect bull’s-eye splashdown,” Mission Control’s Rob Navias announced, confirming the capsule landed precisely where trajectory calculations predicted.

Launched from Florida on April 1, the astronauts accumulated one success after another as they deftly navigated NASA’s long-awaited lunar comeback—the first major step in establishing a sustainable moon base that could serve as staging point for eventual Mars missions. Artemis II didn’t land on the moon or even orbit it, instead performing a figure-eight trajectory that took the crew around the lunar far side before returning to Earth.

But the mission broke Apollo 13’s distance record and marked the farthest that humans have ever journeyed from Earth when the crew reached 252,756 miles from home. The record eclipsed Apollo 13’s previous mark set in 1970 during that mission’s emergency circumlunar trajectory after an oxygen tank explosion forced abandonment of landing plans.

In the mission’s most emotionally resonant moment, the tearful astronauts requested permission to name a pair of craters after their moonship and Wiseman’s late wife Carroll. Mission Control granted the request, creating permanent lunar monuments to both technological achievement and personal loss that future astronauts will see when they traverse those regions.

During Monday’s record-breaking flyby, they documented scenes of the moon’s far side never witnessed before by human observers along with a total solar eclipse visible only from deep space. The eclipse in particular “just blew all of us away,” Glover disclosed, conveying the profound impact of witnessing celestial mechanics from perspectives impossible to achieve from Earth’s surface.

Their sense of wonder and profound connection to the mission awed everyone monitoring from the ground, as did their breathtaking photographs of the moon and Earth. The Artemis II crew channeled Apollo 8’s first lunar explorers with Earthset images showing our Blue Marble setting behind the gray moon—reminiscent of Apollo 8’s famous Earthrise photograph from 1968 that transformed humanity’s perspective on our planet’s fragility.

“It just makes you want to continue to go back,” Radigan reflected on the eve of splashdown. “It’s the first of many trips and we just need to continue on because there’s so much” more to learn about the moon and what sustained human presence there could teach us about living beyond Earth.

Their moonshot drew global attention as well as celebrity endorsements, earning recognition from President Donald Trump; Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney; Britain’s King Charles III; Ryan Gosling, star of the latest space film “Project Hail Mary”; Scarlett Johansson of the Marvel Cinematic Universe; and even Captain Kirk himself, William Shatner of television’s original “Star Trek.” The cultural resonance demonstrated space exploration’s enduring power to unite diverse audiences.

Despite its rich scientific yield, the nearly 10-day flight was not without technical challenges. Both the capsule’s drinking water and propellant systems experienced valve problems that required troubleshooting while traveling through deep space. In perhaps the most high-profile predicament, the toilet kept malfunctioning—forcing the astronauts to employ backup waste management procedures not designed for multi-day use.

The astronauts shrugged off all difficulties with characteristic pilot composure. “We can’t explore deeper unless we are doing a few things that are inconvenient,” Koch observed, “unless we’re making a few sacrifices, unless we’re taking a few risks, and those things are all worth it.” Her perspective reflected the pioneering spirit that has driven exploration throughout human history.

Hansen added: “You do a lot of testing on the ground, but your final test is when you get this hardware to space and it’s a doozy.” The Canadian astronaut’s comment acknowledged the irreplaceable value of actual flight testing versus simulations, no matter how sophisticated ground-based preparations become.

Under the revamped Artemis program, next year’s Artemis III will witness astronauts practicing docking their capsule with a lunar lander or two in orbit around Earth—critical maneuvers required before attempting actual moon landings. Artemis IV will attempt to land a crew of two near the moon’s south pole in 2028, targeting regions where permanently shadowed craters may contain ice deposits useful for life support and rocket fuel production.

The Artemis II astronauts’ primary allegiance was to those future crews whose missions will build upon lessons learned during this pioneering flight, Wiseman emphasized. “But we really hoped in our soul is that we could for just for a moment have the world pause and remember that this is a beautiful planet and a very special place in our universe, and we should all cherish what we have been gifted,” he reflected.

As recovery helicopters plucked the four astronauts from the bobbing capsule in Pacific swells and transported them to the USS John P. Murtha for initial medical examinations and debriefings, NASA officials began the complex process of extracting every possible lesson from the mission to improve future flights.

Engineers will meticulously examine the returned heat shield to understand exactly how the thermal protection system performed under the extreme conditions of lunar return velocities. The valve problems in both water and propellant systems will be investigated to determine whether design modifications are required or if the issues reflected one-time anomalies unlikely to recur.

The toilet malfunctions—while seemingly mundane compared to dramatic reentry sequences—actually represent significant engineering challenges given the difficulty of waste management in zero gravity and the health risks of inadequate sanitation systems on missions lasting weeks or months. Solving these problems proves essential for sustainable deep space exploration.

For the four Artemis II astronauts, the return to Earth gravity after 10 days in weightlessness will require days or weeks of physical rehabilitation as their bodies readjust to bearing their own weight and pumping blood against gravitational pull. The physiological impacts of extended spaceflight remain among the most significant challenges for eventual Mars missions that could last years.

As Wiseman, Glover, Koch, and Hansen begin that recovery process surrounded by families and colleagues celebrating their safe return, they can take satisfaction in knowing they have reignited humanity’s push beyond low Earth orbit after decades of circling our planet at relatively safe altitudes. Their successful mission demonstrates that the United States—in partnership with Canada and other international allies—retains the capability to venture into deep space despite the retirement of Apollo-era infrastructure.

Whether that capability translates into sustained lunar presence and eventual Mars exploration depends on political will, continued funding, and successful execution of increasingly complex missions building toward permanent off-world human settlements. For now, the triumphant splashdown of Artemis II proves that humanity’s reach can still extend to the moon and beyond when vision, resources, and courage align.

The Associated Press

Gunmen Kill 8 Family Members in Nighttime Attack on Plateau State Village, Nigeria

0

Gunmen invaded Mbwelle village in Bokkos Local Government Area of Plateau State, Nigeria, on Thursday night and killed at least eight persons, mostly members of the same family, in a prolonged assault that lasted several hours without security forces intervening despite the community’s proximity to Bokkos town and military installations.

Those killed included Elder Iliya Mangut Dakus, Mr. Luck Titus Dakus, Mr. Habila Istifanu Dakus, Mr. Hassan Istifanus Dakus, Mrs. Hassan Moses Dakus, Biggie Lucky Dakus, Sunday Gideon Dakus, and Mr. Innocent Barnabas Makwin. The concentration of victims from the Dakus family suggests either deliberate targeting based on family vendettas or that attackers focused on a single compound where extended family members resided together.

The Chairman of the Community Peace Observers in Bokkos Local Government Area, Nigeria, Kefas Mallai, confirmed the killings to The PUNCH in Jos on Friday. He disclosed the attack occurred around 11 p.m. when the assailants invaded the community and opened fire indiscriminately on residents, leaving approximately three other persons injured while some community members remained missing—suggesting the death toll could rise once searches of surrounding areas are completed.

Mallai emphasized: “There was an attack last night at Mbwelle village. The village is very close to Bokkos town. So far eight persons have been confirmed dead this morning.” The proximity to Bokkos town—a district headquarters with government presence and security installations—makes the prolonged attack without intervention particularly troubling for residents questioning whether security forces possess the capability or willingness to protect rural populations.

“The people are saying they want to protest because the security men have not protected them and the attack lasted for hours and yet, no presence of security to repel the assailants until those people finished and left. No trace,” Mallai revealed, conveying community outrage that gunmen could operate for extended periods before departing unmolested by military or police forces supposedly responsible for preventing such violence.

He added: “The attack lasted for several hours with no visible security presence to repel the attackers.” The emphasis on duration suggests this was not a brief raid but rather a sustained assault during which security forces theoretically had ample time to deploy reinforcements and engage the attackers if they possessed the will and capacity to do so.

Mallai further alleged that security forces did not respond despite the area’s proximity to their installations, and that personnel were currently deployed to protect a specific community suspected by natives of Bokkos to be the origin of the attackers. The explosive allegation—that security forces prioritize protecting suspected attacker communities over defending victims—reflects deep distrust between Plateau State residents and authorities they believe have chosen sides in communal conflicts.

Youth Leader of Bokkos Christopher Luka also confirmed the incident, characterizing it as “a sad and devastating assault on the people of Bokkos and Plateau State as a whole.” His language framing the attack as assault on the entire state rather than merely one village suggests he views it as part of broader patterns of violence targeting specific ethnic or religious communities.

“The gunmen came around 11pm and started shooting sporadically. They targeted one family mostly. We have eight confirmed dead, some seriously injured, and others still unaccounted for,” Luka disclosed, providing additional evidence that attackers focused on a particular household rather than killing randomly throughout the village.

Efforts to obtain reaction from the Plateau State Police Command spokesman, DSP Alfred Alabo, proved unsuccessful as of press time. The Media Officer for the Joint Military Taskforce, Chinonso Oteh, was not immediately available to speak on the incident when contacted. “I will get back to you,” he stated without providing substantive information about military response to the attack or investigations underway.

The PUNCH documented that Bokkos and other neighboring local government areas of Plateau State have faced security challenges in recent years. The situation escalated last week when the Berom Youth Moulders Association raised alarm over unrelenting ambushes and killings targeting residents in Barkin Ladi, Riyom, and Jos South local government areas, even with security operatives on the ground.

In a statement signed by its National Publicity Secretary Rwang Tengwong, the group led by National President Dalyop Mwantiri characterized the attacks as a calculated campaign of terror allegedly aimed at grabbing ancestral lands. The land-grabbing accusation transforms the violence from random criminality into systematic ethnic cleansing designed to displace indigenous populations and transfer control of territories to outsider groups.

According to the association, on Wednesday gunmen ambushed travelers returning from mining activities around the Great Commission area along Bokkos Road, heading to Nding in Fan District of Barkin Ladi Local Government Area, at approximately 4:15 p.m. The attackers opened fire on the victims, killing Mr. Ayuba Pam of Nding Sesut. Two others, Mr. Alfred Dung and Mr. Nathaniel Bitrus, sustained serious injuries and were receiving treatment in hospital.

In a separate incident the same evening around 6:30 p.m., gunmen ambushed and killed Mr. Christopher Joshua, a father of three from the Byei community in Riyom Local Government Area, along the Gwolhoss–Byei road as he returned home from daily activities. The targeting of individuals on rural roads during daylight or early evening hours suggests attackers maintain sufficient control over territories to conduct operations without fear of security force intervention.

The Berom Youth Moulders described the incidents as part of sustained aggression against Berom communities and expressed concern that such ambushes continued on busy rural roads used by farmers, miners, and travelers despite security agencies knowing the flashpoints and hideouts of the attackers. The assertion that authorities know attack locations and perpetrator bases but fail to act transforms the issue from mere security incapacity into potential complicity or deliberate inaction.

The association called on security agencies to immediately increase surveillance and patrols along critical corridors, including the Great Commission–Bokkos road, Great Commission–Gashish axis, Rahoss–Rim road, Kwi–Farin Lamba road, Gwolhoss–Jol–Sho road, and Rim–Bachi road. The lengthy list of dangerous routes illustrates how extensive territories have become effectively ungovernable as armed groups operate with apparent impunity.

The Thursday night massacre in Mbwelle village represents the latest incident in escalating violence that has transformed Plateau State from Nigeria’s “Home of Peace and Tourism”—its official slogan—into one of the nation’s most dangerous regions where rural populations live under constant threat of nighttime raids, highway ambushes, and targeted killings.

The violence in Plateau State reflects broader patterns of farmer-herder conflicts, ethnic tensions, land disputes, and religious divisions that have plagued Nigeria’s Middle Belt region for decades. However, the systematic nature of recent attacks and allegations about land-grabbing objectives suggest the violence has evolved beyond spontaneous clashes into organized campaigns with strategic territorial objectives.

For residents of Mbwelle village now burying eight neighbors—including entire branches of the Dakus family tree—the failure of security forces to intervene during hours of gunfire confirms their worst suspicions that government protection extends only to favored communities while others are abandoned to their fate. The determination to protest despite risks of violent suppression demonstrates how profoundly the attack has shaken community trust in authorities.

The concentration of eight deaths within one extended family will devastate Mbwelle’s social fabric as survivors confront not merely individual losses but the decimation of family networks providing economic support, childcare, agricultural labor, and emotional sustenance. The injured struggling to recover in hospital face uncertain futures given Nigeria’s inadequate rural healthcare infrastructure.

For the still-missing community members, families endure agonizing uncertainty about whether their loved ones fled into surrounding bush and will eventually return, were abducted by attackers for ransom or other purposes, or lie dead in locations not yet discovered by search teams. The ambiguity compounds grief and prevents proper mourning or burial according to cultural traditions.

As Plateau State authorities maintain silence about the massacre and security forces offer no explanations for their absence during the prolonged assault, residents of Bokkos and surrounding areas draw conclusions about governmental priorities and their own vulnerability that will shape their responses to future threats. 

Whether those responses involve increased self-defense preparations, migration to safer regions, or organized resistance against both attackers and apparently indifferent security forces remains uncertain.

For now, Mbwelle village mourns eight dead, tends three wounded, searches for the missing, and demands answers about why hours of gunfire failed to summon any security response in a nation where government officials insist they are winning the fight against criminality and terrorism that increasingly appears to be winning the fight against governmental authority itself.

Overloaded tourist boat capsizes in northern India, killing at least 10 near Vrindavan

0

At least 10 people were killed Friday when an overcrowded tourist boat overturned in the Yamuna River near the temple town of Vrindavan in northern India, local officials said.

The privately operated vessel, designed to carry about 15 passengers, was transporting roughly 25 people when it capsized midstream, authorities said. Early findings indicate that strong winds destabilized the boat before it collided with a floating bridge and overturned.

Chandraprakash Singh, a senior administrative official, said 15 people were pulled from the water, with four in critical condition. The victims were all Indian nationals, including six women.

Officials said many passengers were not wearing life jackets, and initial inspections suggested the boat was not properly maintained. The operator fled the scene following the incident and remains at large.

The group on board was part of a larger gathering of about 150 visitors traveling in the area, a major pilgrimage destination that draws large crowds year-round.

Fatal boating accidents occur frequently in India, where safety standards are often uneven and overcrowding is common. A similar incident in 2023 in southern India left at least 22 people dead.

The tragedy underscores persistent safety gaps in India’s inland water transport system, particularly in high-traffic religious and tourist destinations. Despite repeated fatal incidents, enforcement of passenger limits and safety regulations remains inconsistent, especially among privately operated vessels.

The absence of life jackets in this case reflects a broader pattern seen in past disasters, where basic safety measures are either ignored or inadequately monitored. While local authorities often announce investigations after such incidents, long-term structural reforms have been slow to materialize.

Vrindavan’s status as a major pilgrimage hub adds another layer of complexity. Seasonal surges in visitors place pressure on transport operators to maximize capacity, sometimes at the expense of safety. Without stricter oversight and penalties for violations, similar incidents are likely to recur.

The operator’s reported flight from the scene also raises questions about accountability and regulatory enforcement. Strengthening licensing systems and ensuring routine inspections could play a critical role in preventing future disasters.

The Associated Press

Trump warns of renewed Iran strikes as U.S. warships rearm ahead of high-stakes talks

0

President Donald Trump signaled a potential escalation in the conflict with Iran, saying U.S. warships are being rearmed with advanced weapons as Washington prepares for decisive negotiations aimed at securing a longer-term peace agreement.

In remarks carried by the New York Post and echoed by The Times of Israel, citing AFP, Trump indicated that military options remain firmly on the table if diplomacy fails. He described an ongoing military buildup, noting that naval forces are being supplied with upgraded weaponry following earlier strikes in the conflict.

“We have a reset going,” Trump said, adding that U.S. forces are being equipped with what he characterized as the most advanced weapons systems. He emphasized that those assets would be used if negotiations do not produce an agreement.

The warning comes as Vice President JD Vance and envoy Steve Witkoff travel to Pakistan for talks expected to test a fragile pause in hostilities announced earlier in the week. Trump has framed the negotiations as a pivotal moment, saying it will soon become clear whether a broader settlement can be reached.

In separate comments posted on his Truth Social platform, Trump cast doubt on Iran’s reliability as a negotiating partner, suggesting inconsistencies between its public statements and private assurances. He reiterated his administration’s position that Iran must abandon any pursuit of nuclear weapons capability as part of a final deal.

Vance also underscored the administration’s cautious stance, signaling openness to diplomacy while warning that the United States would not tolerate bad-faith negotiations. He said the U.S. delegation would approach the talks with clear expectations set by the president.

The developments unfold against a backdrop of heightened tensions in the region, where recent military exchanges and disruptions to key shipping routes have raised concerns about broader instability and global economic fallout.

The latest statements highlight a dual-track strategy by the Trump administration that blends diplomacy with overt military pressure. By publicly emphasizing the rearming of warships, the United States appears to be leveraging deterrence as a negotiating tool, aiming to compel concessions while maintaining readiness for rapid escalation.

This approach carries significant risks. While it may strengthen Washington’s bargaining position, it also raises the likelihood of miscalculation, particularly in a region already strained by overlapping conflicts. Iran’s leadership, facing internal and external pressures, may interpret such signals as coercive, potentially hardening its stance rather than encouraging compromise.

The timing of the remarks is also notable. With global energy markets sensitive to disruptions in major shipping routes, any indication of renewed conflict could trigger volatility in oil prices and broader financial markets. The mere suggestion that military action could resume has already contributed to uncertainty among investors and policymakers.

Diplomatically, the talks in Pakistan represent a critical inflection point. A breakthrough could stabilize the region and restore confidence in international shipping lanes. Failure, however, could set the stage for a rapid return to hostilities, with consequences extending far beyond the immediate conflict zone.

NewYorkPost/TheSun/TimesofIsrael