Iran’s parliament speaker said Wednesday that a ceasefire and negotiations with the United States are “unreasonable,” accusing Washington of violating key conditions in a proposed framework to end the conflict.
Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf said the United States failed to meet three of Iran’s 10 conditions for ending the fighting, raising new doubts about the durability of a ceasefire agreement reached less than a day earlier.
In a social media post, Ghalibaf pointed to continued Israeli military actions in Lebanon, an alleged drone entry into Iranian airspace after the ceasefire took effect, and U.S. insistence that any final agreement must prohibit Iran from maintaining nuclear enrichment capabilities.
The accusations come as the fragile ceasefire shows signs of unraveling, with both sides claiming success while deep disagreements remain unresolved.
The White House announced shortly before Ghalibaf’s comments that Vice President JD Vance will lead the U.S. delegation to upcoming talks aimed at ending the conflict. The negotiations are set to begin Saturday in Islamabad.
Officials say the talks are intended to build on the temporary ceasefire and address broader issues, including security guarantees and nuclear restrictions. However, Iran’s latest statements highlight the challenges facing negotiators as they attempt to move toward a more lasting agreement.
Iran’s accusation that the United States violated elements of the deal framework underscores how fragile the current ceasefire remains. Agreements reached under intense pressure often leave critical details unresolved, increasing the likelihood of disputes shortly after implementation.
The issues raised by Iran reflect core points of contention that have long complicated negotiations. Disagreements over military activity, territorial security and nuclear capabilities remain central obstacles to any lasting settlement.
The timing of the remarks, coming just as new diplomatic talks are announced, suggests Iran may be seeking leverage ahead of negotiations. By publicly challenging U.S. compliance, Iranian officials could be positioning themselves to push for concessions during upcoming discussions.
At the same time, the involvement of senior U.S. leadership in the talks indicates Washington is prioritizing a diplomatic resolution, even as tensions persist.
Whether the ceasefire can hold will likely depend on both sides’ willingness to address immediate concerns while working toward broader compromises. Without progress, the risk of renewed escalation remains high.
