Home Blog Page 16

Tennessee Republicans Eliminate State’s Only Black-Majority Congressional District

By
admin
-
0

NASHVILLE, Tenn. — Tennessee Republicans tore apart the state’s only majority-Black congressional district Thursday, pushing through a new map that splits Memphis across three separate Republican-leaning districts and sets up the likely end of a Democratic congressional seat that has existed for nearly two decades — all within days of a Supreme Court ruling that stripped away the federal protections that had kept such moves in check.

Governor Bill Lee signed the map into law the same day. The Tennessee NAACP filed a lawsuit hours later.

The vote did not happen quietly. Protesters packed the gallery and filled the hallways of the state capitol, chanting “no new maps” and “we the people” and sounding air horns loud enough to disrupt floor proceedings. Republican House Speaker Cameron Sexton had protesters removed from the balcony repeatedly as the vote moved forward. Black lawmakers stood at the front of the House chamber linking arms in prayer as the final tally was called.

In the Senate, Democratic state Sen. Charlane Oliver climbed on top of her desk and unfurled a bedsheet that read “No Jim Crow 2.0” and “Stop the TN Steal.” Other Democrats turned their backs on the chamber dais. Protesters chanting outside the Senate doors could be heard inside throughout the debate.

The map passed anyway.

What the Map Does

The new district lines carve up the Memphis-based seat held by Democratic Rep. Steve Cohen, who has represented the city since 2007, spreading his constituents into three districts that stretch hundreds of miles east into rural Republican Tennessee. The plan also further divides the Nashville metropolitan area — the state’s other Democratic stronghold — into five separate districts.

The result is a congressional map that positions Republicans to win all nine of Tennessee’s U.S. House seats in November’s midterm elections. Republicans already control eight of the nine. Cohen’s district is the last Democratic seat in the state.

Memphis is a majority-Black city. Shelby County, which contains Memphis, is now divided three ways under the new lines. The city’s history in the American civil rights movement made the symbolism of the vote land with particular force for those who opposed it.

What Lawmakers Said

Republican state Sen. John Stevens, who sponsored the redistricting bill, kept his justification simple. “Tennessee is a conservative state,” Stevens said. “Its congressional delegation should reflect that.”

Stevens said the maps were drawn using census data to elect more Republicans. Democrats noted the census does not include partisan registration data, raising questions about how partisan outcomes could be the stated goal of a process that relied on demographic information.

Republican state Rep. Jason Zachary was more direct about what the party stood to gain. “This gives us a unique opportunity for the first time in history to have an all-Republican delegation sent from Tennessee to Washington, D.C., to represent conservative values,” Zachary said.

No Republican spoke in defense of the map on the House floor. When one member rose to speak, the noise from protesters in the gallery became so loud the speaker called the vote while Democratic members stood and walked out.

Democratic lawmakers did not hold back. State Rep. Justin Jones, a Black Democrat, drew a straight line from the new map to the segregation-era laws the civil rights movement was built to dismantle.

“It is a form of Jim Crow terror,” Jones said. “You know what you’re doing. It’s shameful.”

Democratic Rep. Gloria Johnson of Knoxville was equally blunt. “This is not a special session,” she said from the floor. “This is a white-power rally and a white-power grab. Vote yes — you’re telling everyone you’re racist.”

State Sen. Raumesh Akbari, the Memphis Democrat who leads the Senate Democratic caucus, addressed her colleagues directly as the vote approached.

“When you had an opportunity to do right, did you beat people back on Edmund Pettus Bridge?” Akbari said. “When you had an opportunity to do right, did you vote to make sure that those Black folks in Memphis who believe in this state, who pay their taxes, who work just like everyone else, have a right to be politically represented by folks who share their interest and who advocate for them on a federal level?”

The Supreme Court Decision That Started It

Tennessee moved this fast because a door that had been legally closed swung open last week. The U.S. Supreme Court issued a 6-3 ruling finding that Louisiana had improperly relied on race when drawing a second majority-Black congressional district to comply with the Voting Rights Act. The decision effectively dismantled the Act’s core protection for minority voters in redistricting — the legal shield that had blocked moves like Thursday’s Tennessee vote for decades.

President Donald Trump pushed Republican-led states to take advantage of the ruling immediately. Tennessee was the first to act, but it is unlikely to be the last.

Louisiana has suspended its May 16 U.S. House primary — even though tens of thousands of voters had already cast early ballots — to give Republican lawmakers time to draw a new map eliminating a majority-Black district. In South Carolina, Republicans are moving legislation to erase the majority-Black district held by Democratic Rep. Jim Clyburn, a civil rights activist serving his 17th term in Congress. Alabama has asked the Supreme Court to reverse a court order that created a second majority-Black district in 2023 and allow the state to revert to a single majority-Black seat. Alabama Republicans also advanced a bill this week to postpone the state’s May 19 primary if the court rules in their favor.

Taken together, the three states — Louisiana, South Carolina, and Alabama — hold five majority-minority congressional districts currently represented by Democrats. All five are now in play.

The Tennessee branch of the NAACP filed suit Thursday against Governor Lee and the state legislature seeking to block the new map, alleging the redistricting violated state law and the Tennessee constitution. The legal challenge sets up a fight that could reach federal courts as the November midterms approach and the new district lines are already in effect for candidate filing.

Thursday’s vote is the latest move in a mid-decade redistricting war that has reshaped the national congressional map at a pace and intensity rarely seen outside of the once-a-decade post-census cycle. It began last year when Trump pressed Texas Republicans to abandon their existing map and redraw lines targeting five Democratic incumbents. Other states in both parties followed.

Republicans have built a net advantage of roughly four House seats across nine states from the ongoing cycle, with Louisiana, South Carolina, and Alabama still in motion. Litigation in Virginia, Florida, and Missouri could shift the numbers further in either direction. Republican gains across all pending states could reach as many as 14 seats. Democrats are pursuing their own redistricting opportunities in states they control and could pick up as many as 10.

Tennessee will become the ninth state to enact a new congressional map ahead of the midterms. States where filing deadlines have already passed are now looking at the 2028 cycle for further map changes.

The Supreme Court ruling that enabled Thursday’s vote did something the civil rights movement spent decades fighting to prevent. The Voting Rights Act of 1965 was written specifically to stop states from using the mechanics of democracy — district lines, voting rules, registration requirements — to dilute Black political power. For 60 years, that law provided legal grounds to challenge exactly the kind of map Tennessee approved Thursday.

That legal architecture is now severely weakened. What Republicans in Tennessee, Louisiana, Alabama, and South Carolina are doing is not a surprise — it was the predictable and immediate consequence of a ruling that told them the federal law protecting minority voting power no longer applied in the same way. The question the ruling left unanswered is what replaces it.

State constitutions, like the one the NAACP cited in its Tennessee lawsuit, offer one avenue. Federal litigation under remaining Voting Rights Act provisions offers another. But both paths are slower than the redistricting process, and maps that are in place when November arrives will determine who wins the seats regardless of what courts eventually decide.

The deeper issue is what the dissolution of majority-minority districts means for the communities they were designed to represent. Memphis is a majority-Black city. Its voters are now spread across three districts stretching into rural Republican Tennessee. Their collective political voice, which once had the weight to elect a representative of their choosing, has been diluted into three districts where they are a minority in each.

That is the point. Republican lawmakers said so openly. The only question is whether the legal system moves fast enough to do anything about it before the ballots are counted.

NBC/AP/Reuters

Nigerian Army Confirms Deadly Attack on Magumeri Base, Says Troops Repelled Assault

By
admin
-
0

The Nigerian military says it has repelled an attack by fighters linked to the Islamic State West Africa Province on a forward operating base in Magumeri, Borno State, confirming that two soldiers were killed during the clash.

In a statement issued Thursday, Lieutenant Colonel Sani Uba, spokesperson for the Joint Task Force in the northeast under Operation Hadin Kai, said troops fought off the assault after militants breached part of the base during a nighttime operation.

The military described the response as swift and forceful, stating that troops “gallantly and decisively” pushed back the attackers following intense fighting.

The assault occurred in the early hours of May 7, when fighters attempted to infiltrate the base under cover of darkness and reduced visibility. Officials acknowledged that the attackers managed to penetrate an isolated section of the facility before being driven back.

According to the statement, troops inflicted heavy losses on the attackers. Follow-up operations in the surrounding area revealed what the military described as evidence of significant casualties among the fighters, including blood trails and bodies left behind as they retreated.

Security forces also recovered weapons abandoned during the withdrawal, including heavy machine guns, rifles and ammunition.

Despite the military’s account of a successful defense, officials confirmed that two soldiers were killed in the confrontation. An officer and several others sustained injuries and are receiving medical care, with authorities saying their conditions are stable.

The military also noted that parts of the base, including some equipment and temporary structures, were damaged by fire during the exchange.

Earlier accounts from local sources, cited by SaharaReporters, suggested the attack may have been more severe. Those reports indicated that a large group of fighters arrived in multiple armed vehicles and launched a surprise assault, causing casualties and forcing some personnel to withdraw from the camp.

Some sources claimed that additional soldiers were killed and that attackers seized military vehicles and weapons. They also reported that the base commander was among those injured.

The military did not confirm those details but acknowledged that the attackers briefly breached the facility.

Magumeri, located about 35 kilometers from Maiduguri, has long been a flashpoint in Nigeria’s conflict with armed groups. The area has faced repeated attacks over the years due to its strategic position in Borno State, a region at the center of the insurgency.

The latest incident adds to growing concerns about security in northeastern Nigeria, where attacks on military positions have increased in recent months.

In a separate incident weeks earlier, insurgents killed more than 10 soldiers, including a senior commander in the Monguno area. In March, another attack in Kukawa led to the deaths of a commanding officer and several troops after a base was overrun. Days before that, another officer was killed during coordinated assaults in the state.

These repeated attacks highlight the persistent threat posed by armed groups operating in the region, despite years of military operations aimed at weakening their capabilities.

The attack on Magumeri underscores the evolving tactics used by armed groups in northeastern Nigeria. Rather than large-scale territorial control, fighters are increasingly focusing on targeted strikes against military installations, often using surprise and mobility to gain temporary advantage.

Security analysts say such attacks serve multiple purposes. They allow fighters to seize weapons, disrupt military operations and project strength, even when they cannot hold territory for long periods.

The conflicting accounts surrounding the Magumeri incident also point to challenges in information flow during active conflict. While the military emphasized its successful defense, local sources painted a more chaotic picture, suggesting that the full extent of the damage may not yet be clear.

This gap in narratives is not uncommon in conflict zones and often reflects both operational secrecy and the difficulty of verifying events in real time.

The continued attacks also raise questions about the effectiveness of current counterinsurgency strategies. While Nigerian forces have made gains over the years, the ability of armed groups to carry out coordinated assaults indicates that they remain capable and adaptive.

For civilians in the region, the impact goes beyond the battlefield. Persistent insecurity affects daily life, disrupts economic activity and forces communities to remain in a constant state of uncertainty.

The situation in Borno State remains a critical test for Nigeria’s security forces. Sustained pressure on armed groups, combined with improved intelligence and local cooperation, will likely be key to reducing the frequency and scale of such attacks.

For now, the Magumeri incident serves as another reminder that the conflict in northeastern Nigeria is far from over, with both sides continuing to engage in a prolonged and complex struggle.

Source: SaharaReporters.

U.S. and Iran Exchange Fire in Strait of Hormuz as Navy Destroyers Come Under Attack

By
admin
-
0

STRAIT OF HORMUZ — The United States and Iran exchanged direct fire Thursday in the Strait of Hormuz, shattering a month of fragile calm and throwing the future of a ceasefire that had barely held since April 7 into serious doubt — just as Washington was waiting for Tehran’s answer on a peace proposal that could end the two-month war.

Three U.S. Navy guided-missile destroyers — USS Truxtun, USS Rafael Peralta, and USS Mason — came under attack as they transited the strait toward the Gulf of Oman. Iranian forces fired multiple missiles, drones, and deployed small boats against the ships, U.S. Central Command said in a post on X.

None of the American vessels were struck.

U.S. forces intercepted the incoming fire and hit back, targeting Iranian military facilities on the ground that CENTCOM said were directly responsible for the attack. Strikes hit at least two locations — Bandar Abbas and Qeshm Island — destroying missile and drone launch sites, command and control positions, and intelligence and surveillance nodes, a U.S. official told NBC News.

“CENTCOM does not seek escalation but remains positioned and ready to protect American forces,” the command said.

Iran’s top joint military command told a different story. Tehran accused the United States of violating the April 7 ceasefire by targeting an Iranian oil tanker and a second vessel attempting to enter the strait. Air defense systems were activated in the Iranian capital, the semiofficial Mehr news agency reported.

Each side accused the other of firing first. Neither account could be independently verified.

The exchange came at the worst possible diplomatic moment. Washington had submitted a peace proposal to Tehran through Pakistani intermediaries and was waiting for Iran’s response. Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesperson said Thursday that Tehran had not yet reached a conclusion on the plan.

The proposed framework, according to sources and officials familiar with the negotiations, would unfold across three stages: a formal end to the war, resolution of the Strait of Hormuz crisis, and a 30-day negotiating window to address a broader agreement covering longer-term disputes.

What the proposal does not include is significant. It leaves Iran’s nuclear program unaddressed for now and does not require immediate reopening of the strait — the waterway that before the war carried one-fifth of the world’s oil and gas supply. Those omissions reflect the difficulty of bridging the gap between what Washington demands and what Tehran will accept, and they guarantee that even a successful first-stage agreement would leave the most combustible issues for later rounds of talks.

Iran’s foreign minister had said Wednesday that Tehran was reviewing the proposal. Thursday’s exchange of fire did not constitute an official breakdown of negotiations, but it made the path to a signed agreement considerably narrower.

The fighting in the strait was not the only escalation Thursday.

The U.S. imposed fresh sanctions on Iraq’s deputy oil minister and three militia leaders, citing their support for Iran. The move extended Washington’s economic pressure campaign beyond Iranian territory and into the regional network Tehran relies on for supply lines and proxy influence.

In Lebanon, Israel said it killed a Hezbollah commander in an airstrike on Beirut — the first Israeli strike on the Lebanese capital since a ceasefire there was agreed last month. A halt to Israeli attacks on Lebanon is one of Iran’s stated demands in negotiations with Washington, making the Beirut strike another variable complicating the diplomatic picture.

The war began Feb. 28 when the U.S. and Israel launched strikes against Iran. A ceasefire took effect April 7 and had largely held — marked by periodic violations but no full resumption of hostilities — until Thursday’s exchange in the strait.

What happened Thursday follows a pattern that historians of armed conflict recognize immediately. Two militaries operating in close proximity, each with rules of engagement that authorize defensive fire, each with a genuine incentive to frame whatever happened as the other side’s provocation — and a ceasefire with no enforcement mechanism, no neutral monitoring presence, and no agreed definition of what counts as a violation.

The U.S. says Iran fired first. Iran says the U.S. targeted its ships first. Both accounts are structurally convenient for the side offering them. In the absence of independent verification, the factual record becomes a function of which government’s narrative gains more traction internationally — a competition the United States typically wins in Western capitals and Iran typically wins nowhere, which does not necessarily mean Washington’s version is complete.

The more important question is what Thursday means for the peace process. Iran was reviewing a proposal. Thursday’s strikes give hardliners in Tehran who oppose any deal additional ammunition to argue that the United States cannot be trusted to honor a ceasefire even while negotiations are underway. It gives advocates for continued resistance a fresh grievance to point to. And it raises the domestic political cost, inside Iran, of the kind of concessions the American proposal apparently requires.

On the American side, the strikes on Bandar Abbas and Qeshm Island are described as defensive and limited — not a resumption of major combat operations. That framing matters legally and politically. But Iran does not necessarily accept the distinction between a targeted strike on its military facilities and an act of war, and the line between the two has a way of dissolving when missiles are landing.

Saudi Arabia has already said it will not allow its territory or bases to be used for U.S. military operations related to the strait. Russia and China have vetoed Security Council action. Pakistan is mediating but has no leverage to enforce compliance. The diplomatic architecture supporting a peace agreement is thin, and Thursday just put more weight on it than it was built to hold.

The ceasefire is not officially over. But it is no longer intact.

AP/NBC/Reuters

Iran Creates Agency to Tax and Control Strait of Hormuz Shipping

By
admin
-
0

Iran has created a new government agency to control who passes through the Strait of Hormuz and how much they pay to do it, a move that maritime law experts say violates international law and that has piled fresh anxiety onto a global shipping crisis already choking hundreds of commercial vessels inside the Persian Gulf.

The agency, called the Persian Gulf Strait Authority, was identified Thursday by shipping data firm Lloyd’s List Intelligence, which said the body was positioning itself as the sole authority with power to grant transit permission through the waterway. Lloyd’s said the authority had already sent it an application form for vessels seeking passage — a bureaucratic formalization of a chokehold that Iran has been tightening since the war with the United States and Israel began Feb. 28.

The move came the same day Pakistani Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar spoke by phone with Iranian counterpart Abbas Araghchi, and Pakistani officials expressed optimism — cautious but notable — that a peace deal between Tehran and Washington was drawing closer.

“We expect an agreement sooner rather than later,” Pakistani Foreign Ministry spokesperson Tahir Andrabi said Thursday. “We hope the parties will reach a peaceful and sustainable solution that will contribute not only to peace in our region but to international peace as well.”

He declined to give a timeline.

The Strait as a Revenue Stream

Iran has effectively sealed the Strait of Hormuz since the war began, while the United States has blockaded Iranian ports from the other direction. The result is a commercial standstill that has sent fuel prices climbing and rattled economies far beyond the Persian Gulf. Hundreds of ships sit bottled up in the Gulf with no clear path to open water.

The new Persian Gulf Strait Authority formalizes what had been an unofficial and opaque arrangement. Under the existing system, Iran had been vetting certain vessels and, for at least some of them, collecting a tax on their cargo before allowing passage through the strait’s northern waters near the Iranian coastline. The new agency gives that practice an institutional name and a paper trail.

Maritime law experts were direct about what that means legally. The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea requires countries to permit peaceful passage through their territorial waters. Iran’s demand to approve and tax commercial vessels crosses that line, they said. The U.S. and its Gulf allies are pushing the U.N. Security Council for a resolution condemning Iran’s grip on the strait and threatening sanctions. A previous resolution calling for reopening the waterway was vetoed by Russia and China, Iran’s two most significant diplomatic shields.

Mixed Signals From Washington

The Trump administration has not projected a consistent message about how it intends to end the conflict. A fragile ceasefire has largely held since April 8. Previous declarations that military operations were finished gave way to fresh threats of bombing if Tehran rejected terms allowing oil and gas shipments to resume. Trump then launched “Project Freedom,” a military effort to force a shipping corridor through the strait — and suspended it after two days.

Only two American-flagged merchant ships are confirmed to have passed through the U.S.-guarded route during the operation. The U.S. military said it sank six Iranian small boats that threatened civilian vessels during the attempt. Trump said he paused the effort to allow more time for a peace agreement to take shape.

A Saudi official told the Associated Press on Thursday that Riyadh had not been consulted before Trump launched the strait-opening operation and had explicitly refused to participate.

“We told them that we are not part of this and that they can’t use our territories and bases for this,” the official said, speaking anonymously because they were not authorized to discuss the matter publicly. Saudi Arabia also conveyed a message directly to Iran that the kingdom would play no role in any U.S. military action tied to reopening the strait.

The revelation that one of Washington’s most important regional partners actively distanced itself from the operation before it began adds another dimension to why Project Freedom produced limited results and was suspended so quickly.

Iran Reviews the U.S. Proposal

Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei said Thursday that Tehran was reviewing messages relayed through Pakistan — the designated intermediary in the peace negotiations — but had not yet reached a conclusion or sent a response to the U.S. side, Iranian state television reported.

Late Thursday, semiofficial Iranian news agencies Fars and Tasnim reported that explosions were heard in southern Iran near Bandar Abbas. Neither agency identified the source of the blasts, and no further details were immediately confirmed.

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian added an unusual detail to the picture of Iran’s internal deliberations on Thursday, disclosing that he had met recently for more than two hours with Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei. Pezeshkian praised Khamenei’s conduct in the meeting during remarks aired on Iranian state television.

Khamenei, who replaced his father Ayatollah Ali Khamenei after the elder was killed in the war’s opening strikes, has not appeared in public since being wounded early in the conflict. He has communicated exclusively through written statements since being named supreme leader in March. Iranian officials have said he is playing a central role in overseeing the negotiations with Washington, though his precise location and condition remain undisclosed.

The Vatican and the Pope

Across the Atlantic, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio met Thursday with Pope Leo XIV at the Vatican to discuss Middle East peace efforts. The meeting carried its own diplomatic undertone: Pope Leo XIV has been openly critical of the Iran war, a position that has led to direct friction with President Trump.

Lebanon Talks Set for Washington

In a separate development, direct talks between Israel and Lebanon are scheduled to resume in Washington on May 14 and 15, a U.S. official confirmed Thursday, speaking anonymously to discuss plans for the closed-door sessions.

Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, in televised remarks, said Islamabad was in continuous contact with both Iran and the United States around the clock to stop the war and extend the ceasefire.

“Day and night,” Sharif said.

The creation of the Persian Gulf Strait Authority is Iran doing something subtle and consequential at the same time. By establishing a formal government agency with application forms, fee structures, and an institutional name, Tehran is not just controlling the strait — it is asserting permanent sovereign jurisdiction over it in a way that outlasts any individual military confrontation.

This matters because ceasefires end and wars eventually stop, but agencies persist. If the Persian Gulf Strait Authority is still functioning when a peace agreement is eventually signed, Iran will be in a position to argue that its authority over shipping is an established administrative fact rather than a wartime imposition. Dismantling that claim later becomes harder the longer the agency operates and the more vessels submit applications to it.

Maritime law says Iran cannot do this. The U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea is explicit. But international law without enforcement is a strongly worded document, and Russia and China have already vetoed one Security Council resolution on the strait. The practical question is not whether Iran has the legal right — it does not — but whether any external power is willing and able to make the legal reality stick against Iran’s physical control of the waterway.

Saudi Arabia’s refusal to back Project Freedom is a significant piece of that puzzle. If the United States cannot use Saudi territory and bases for a strait-reopening operation, its military options narrow considerably. The Gulf states have their own calculus — they live next to Iran, and they will be there long after any American administration has moved on to other priorities.

The peace talks through Pakistan remain the most plausible exit from the stalemate. But Iran reviewing a proposal and Iran accepting one are different things, and the gap between the two has a way of widening whenever the pressure momentarily eases.

The Associated Press original

Russia Intensifies Assassination Plots Across Europe, Intelligence Officials Warn

By
admin
-
0

Western intelligence agencies are raising alarms over what they describe as a sharp increase in Russian efforts to track and eliminate political opponents and pro-Ukraine figures across Europe, marking a significant escalation in covert operations linked to the war in Ukraine.

Three intelligence officials from different Western countries told The Associated Press that Russian security services have expanded a campaign of targeted attacks since 2022, when Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine. The officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity due to the sensitivity of the information, said the operations now appear more frequent, more aggressive and more willing to target a broader range of individuals.

Among those living under constant threat is Russian activist Vladimir Osechkin, who has been under police protection in France since 2022. French authorities believe his life is in danger due to his work exposing alleged abuses within Russia’s prison system and his support for military defectors.

Court documents reviewed by The Associated Press indicate that in April 2025, a group of Russian nationals monitored Osechkin’s home in southwestern France for hours, recording video and taking photographs. Investigators suspect the surveillance was preparation for a possible assassination attempt. Osechkin has also described earlier incidents that heightened his fears, including a laser-like red dot appearing on his wall, which he believed could have been linked to a weapon sight.

“If it were not for the protection I received, I might not be alive today,” Osechkin said.

Authorities across Europe have uncovered similar plots. In Lithuania, officials disrupted two separate plans targeting activists, including one involving a hidden tracking device placed on a vehicle and another involving an explosive device intended for a mailbox. In Germany, investigators dismantled plots aimed at a senior defense industry executive and a Ukrainian military figure. Polish authorities detained a suspect in 2024 in a case they described as a plan to assassinate Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy.

Spain has also seen deadly consequences. A Russian helicopter pilot who defected was killed there in 2024, with suspicion falling on operatives linked to Moscow.

Intelligence officials say these cases reflect a broader pattern tied to Russia’s strategic goals in Europe. One senior European intelligence officer described the campaign as deliberate and authorized at the highest levels.

“This is not random activity,” the official said. “There is clear political backing behind it.”

The increase in alleged assassination attempts appears to coincide with a wider campaign of disruption attributed to Russia. Western authorities have linked nearly 200 incidents across Europe since the start of the Ukraine war to suspected Russian involvement, including acts of sabotage, arson and espionage.

Investigators say many of these operations rely on intermediaries rather than direct involvement from Russian agents. Individuals with criminal backgrounds or financial incentives are often recruited to carry out surveillance or attacks, making the operations harder to trace.

This approach, according to a former senior British counterterrorism official, gained prominence after the 2018 poisoning of former Russian spy Sergei Skripal in England. The attack, which the United Kingdom blamed on Russian military intelligence, led to the expulsion of hundreds of Russian diplomats across Europe. That crackdown significantly limited Moscow’s ability to operate using official channels.

As a result, analysts say Russia has shifted toward using proxy actors to continue its activities abroad.

Despite multiple plots being stopped, intelligence officials caution that the threat remains persistent. Some believe the operations serve purposes beyond direct assassination, including intimidating critics, discouraging activism and stretching European security resources.

Several individuals targeted in recent plots have refused to retreat from public life despite warnings from authorities.

Ruslan Gabbasov, an activist advocating for independence in a region of Russia, said he declined an offer from Lithuanian authorities to change his identity and relocate after a suspected assassination attempt near his home.

“I cannot disappear,” he said, adding that doing so would undermine the cause he represents.

Similarly, Lithuanian activist Valdas Bartkevičius rejected advice to withdraw from public activity after authorities uncovered a plot involving an explosive device targeting him.

Officials say these responses highlight the broader stakes of the campaign. Beyond physical harm, the operations appear designed to silence opposition voices and weaken support networks for Ukraine across Europe.

Russian authorities have repeatedly denied involvement in assassination attempts abroad. Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov told AP there was no need to comment on the allegations.

Still, Western officials argue that the pattern of incidents, combined with intelligence findings, points to a coordinated strategy.

The reported escalation in targeted operations signals a shift in how geopolitical conflict is unfolding beyond traditional battlefields. Rather than being confined to Ukraine, tensions are increasingly playing out across Europe through covert means.

Security experts say this trend raises serious concerns for European governments. Protecting high-risk individuals requires significant resources, and the growing number of cases could strain law enforcement agencies already dealing with other security challenges.

There are also broader political implications. If activists, journalists and defectors feel unsafe, it could reduce the flow of information about internal conditions in Russia and weaken international advocacy efforts.

At the same time, the use of proxy actors complicates legal accountability. Unlike state-sponsored operatives, these individuals often operate across borders with limited direct links to official institutions, making prosecution more difficult.

The situation also underscores the evolving nature of deterrence. Traditional diplomatic responses, such as sanctions or expulsions, may have limited impact on covert operations carried out through informal networks.

For European leaders, the challenge lies in balancing security with openness. Increasing surveillance and protective measures could help prevent attacks, but they also risk affecting civil liberties and public trust.

Ultimately, intelligence officials warn that the threat is unlikely to fade soon. As long as geopolitical tensions remain high, individuals seen as adversaries by Moscow may continue to face risks.

“Stopping one attempt does not end the danger,” one intelligence official said. “You have to assume there could always be another.”

Sources: The Associated Press.

Ted Turner, Founder of CNN and Pioneer of 24-Hour Cable News, Dies at 87

By
admin
-
0

ATLANTA — Ted Turner is dead. The man who invented the 24-hour news cycle, built a cable television empire from a failing Atlanta UHF station, gave a billion dollars to the United Nations, and said whatever crossed his mind without apology — died Wednesday at 87.

Turner Enterprises confirmed his death. No cause was given. Turner had been living with Lewy body dementia since at least 2018, when he disclosed the diagnosis publicly from his Montana ranch.

“Ted was an intensely involved and committed leader, intrepid, fearless and always willing to back a hunch and trust his own judgment,” CNN chairman and CEO Mark Thompson said in a statement. “He was and always will be the presiding spirit of CNN.”

He was also, depending on who you asked, the Mouth of the South, Captain Outrageous, Terrible Ted, and — for one glorious year — Time magazine’s Man of the Year.

“If I only had a little humility,” Turner once said, “I’d be perfect.”

The Man Who Built the Machine

Robert Edward Turner III was born Nov. 19, 1938, in Cincinnati. His father was a billboard advertising magnate. His mother was Florence Turner. The family moved south when Ted was nine, and the boy was sent to military schools where he became a champion debater and an accomplished yachtsman — two skills that would serve him well in a life defined by argument and competition.

He enrolled at Brown University in 1956, studied classics instead of business against his father’s wishes, got caught with a woman in his dorm room, and never graduated. He went to work for the family company in Savannah, selling billboard space.

At 24, his father killed himself. Turner took over. He repurchased the firm after a family dispute, made it profitable, and in 1970 — against the advice of everyone around him — bought a failing Atlanta UHF television station for $2.5 million.

They called it the Chicken Noodle Network when he launched CNN a decade later. Nobody was laughing by the time the Gulf War played out live on television in 1991 and the whole world was watching.

CNN and the Superstation

The move that changed everything came in the mid-1970s. Turner became one of the first media owners to use satellite technology to broadcast his station nationally, turning a local Atlanta outlet into the country’s first superstation — programming picked up by cable systems across America.

The lineup was cheap and brilliant: old Hollywood films, throwback sitcoms, Atlanta Braves baseball. The station made money. Turner made more channels. TBS, TNT, Cartoon Network, Turner Classic Movies — each one built on the same instinct that had rescued the UHF station. Give people something to watch. Keep the costs down. Own the library.

CNN aired its first broadcast June 1, 1980, anchored by the husband-and-wife team of David Walker and Lois Hart. Turner said he built it to counter what he called sleazy coverage by the major networks. He promised it would stay on the air until the world ended.

It changed everything about how news moved. The format, the speed, the expectation that something was always happening somewhere and you could watch it right now — all of it traces back to that first broadcast from Atlanta. Fox News and MSNBC exist because CNN proved the model worked.

Warner Bros. Discovery head David Zaslav put it plainly in a message to staff Wednesday. “He did not just disrupt media. He transformed it.”

Sports, Wrestling, and One Very Bad Game

Turner bought the Atlanta Braves in 1976 and the Atlanta Hawks in 1977. The Braves won the World Series in 1995 under his ownership. He marketed the franchise as America’s Team with the unapologetic confidence of a man who believed whatever he said loudly enough would eventually become true.

In 1977, during a losing streak, Turner appointed himself manager of the Braves for one game. They lost 2-1 to Pittsburgh. Baseball officials told him to sit down and stay there.

His involvement in professional wrestling was equally colorful. He had aired wrestling on his stations since the 1970s. In 1988 he bought Jim Crockett Promotions and rebranded it World Championship Wrestling. WCW’s head-to-head ratings battle with the World Wrestling Federation through the late 1990s became one of the most fiercely contested periods in the history of the industry — the Monday Night Wars, as it was known. Turner eventually sold WCW to Vince McMahon’s WWF in 2001.

He also skippered his yacht, the Courageous, to win the America’s Cup. He started the Goodwill Games in 1986 as an Olympic alternative during the Cold War. He ran his life the way he ran his businesses — at speed, with maximum exposure, trusting his gut over everyone else’s expertise.

The Colorization War and the MGM Library

In the mid-1980s Turner bought MGM/UA Entertainment, which came with a library of more than 4,000 films. He announced plans to colorize the black-and-white classics. Hollywood erupted.

Film critic Roger Ebert called Turner’s airing of a colorized version of Casablanca “one of the saddest days in the history of the movies.” The Los Angeles Times labeled Turner “The Man Hollywood Loves to Hate.”

Turner eventually backed down, deciding the process was not worth the cost. He sold MGM/UA but kept the movie library. That library became the backbone of Turner Classic Movies, launched in 1994 — now regarded as one of the finest film preservation channels in television history. The man who tried to colorize Casablanca ended up protecting it.

Jane Fonda, Time Warner, and the Fall

Turner married three times and divorced three times. He had five children — two from his first marriage to Judy Gale Nye and three from his second marriage to Jane Shirley Smith.

His third marriage, in 1991, was to Jane Fonda. The union between a hard-charging capitalist and one of Hollywood’s most outspoken progressives raised eyebrows everywhere. It lasted a decade.

“In his heart, Ted is not a wealthy, powerful, privileged person,” Fonda said in the 2018 HBO documentary “Jane Fonda in Five Acts.” “He’s a little boy who likes to play, and who has wild brilliance, and that’s what I was attracted to.”

They divorced in 2001. Turner told documentarians it was the hardest thing he had survived. “I feel like I was happier when I was with her than subsequently,” he said.

In 1996, Time Warner bought Turner Broadcasting System for $7.5 billion, creating the largest communications company in the world. Turner became vice chairman. In 2001, Time Warner merged with AOL in a $99 billion deal Turner voted for. The merger destroyed billions in shareholder value. Turner was stripped of his oversight of the cable networks he had built. He resigned as vice chairman in 2003 and stepped down from the board three years later.

It was, by any measure, a bad ending to the corporate chapter of his life. Forbes pegged his remaining fortune at $2.8 billion.

The Philanthropist and the Land Baron

Turner channeled what came after into causes. In 1997 he announced a $1 billion donation to the United Nations — the largest single philanthropic gift in American history at the time. The funds created the United Nations Foundation. Twenty years later Turner called it “the best investment I’ve ever made.”

He co-founded the Nuclear Threat Initiative with former Senator Sam Nunn in 2001, a nonprofit organization dedicated to preventing the use of weapons of mass destruction globally. He poured millions into environmental causes through his Turner Foundation.

He became one of the largest private landowners in the United States, holding more than 1.9 million acres across six states. He owned a herd of roughly 50,000 bison and in 2002 co-founded Ted’s Montana Grill, a restaurant chain built around what it claimed was the largest bison menu on earth. He owned ranches in Argentina’s Patagonia. He spent much of his later years on his Montana ranch, fly-fishing and hiking and living the kind of life he had always said mattered more than the business.

In 2018 he told journalist Ted Koppel about the dementia diagnosis with characteristic bluntness. “It’s similar to Alzheimer’s. But not nearly as bad. Alzheimer’s is fatal,” he said. He withdrew from public life in the years that followed.

The Last of the Originals

Ted Turner belonged to a generation of American entrepreneurs who built things from scratch and broke the rules doing it. He was not a technologist or a disruptor in the Silicon Valley mold. He was a salesman, a showman, and a genuine visionary who looked at television in 1979 and saw something nobody else saw — that news could run all day, every day, and people would watch.

He was right. Every cable news network that exists today, every breaking news alert on your phone, every scrolling chyron at the bottom of a screen owes something to the decision Ted Turner made to launch CNN from Atlanta on June 1, 1980.

He was also, by his own admission and by the accounts of people who worked for him, difficult. Blunt to the point of cruelty. Prone to statements that landed like grenades. He compared Rupert Murdoch to Adolf Hitler. He called his employees Jesus freaks. He managed a Major League Baseball team for one game and lost.

None of it diminished what he built. The Chicken Noodle Network became the template for how the world receives its news. The superstation concept rewrote the economics of cable television. The MGM library he almost ruined with colorization now lives on Turner Classic Movies, preserving the films future generations will watch.

He was 87. He got to see what he built become the world.

NBC/Reuters

France Sends Aircraft Carrier Toward Strait of Hormuz as Europe Weighs Maritime Security Mission

By
admin
-
0

France is moving its nuclear-powered aircraft carrier strike group toward the Strait of Hormuz as European leaders intensify discussions over a possible multinational maritime security mission aimed at stabilizing one of the world’s most critical shipping lanes.

French President Emmanuel Macron confirmed Wednesday that the aircraft carrier Charles de Gaulle and its escort fleet were heading south through the Suez Canal into the Red Sea, positioning the group closer to the Gulf region as tensions linked to the Iran war continue to disrupt global trade and energy markets.

The deployment marks one of Europe’s most significant military responses since the conflict between Iran, the United States and Israel escalated earlier this year. The Strait of Hormuz, a narrow waterway between Iran and Oman, handles a substantial share of the world’s oil and natural gas shipments. Since the conflict intensified in late February, attacks on commercial vessels and growing security threats have sharply reduced maritime traffic through the corridor.

Macron described the proposed European operation as a defensive effort focused on restoring confidence among commercial shipping companies and insurers rather than joining the military campaign led by Washington.

In remarks posted on social media, Macron said the initiative being developed alongside Britain “remains distinct from the parties at war” and is intended to restore maritime stability once security conditions improve.

The French leader also disclosed that he held talks Wednesday with Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian and planned to raise the issue during discussions with President Donald Trump.

“A return to calm in the Strait will help advance negotiations on nuclear issues, ballistic matters, and the regional situation,” Macron said, signaling that Paris sees maritime security as closely linked to broader diplomatic efforts surrounding Iran’s nuclear program and regional influence.

French military officials stressed that no deployment into the strait itself has yet been approved. Col. Guillaume Vernet, spokesperson for France’s armed forces chief of staff, said the proposed coalition would only move forward once threats against commercial shipping decrease and insurers regain enough confidence to support renewed traffic through the route.

Vernet noted that any mission would also require cooperation from regional countries, including Iran, which borders the strategic waterway and has effectively restricted navigation through attacks, inspections and threats against vessels since the war began Feb. 28.

“The French position remains defensive and based on international law,” Vernet told The Associated Press.

The Charles de Gaulle is Europe’s only nuclear-powered aircraft carrier and represents the centerpiece of French naval power. Its movement toward the region follows what the French presidency previously described as an “unprecedented” mobilization that includes frigates, amphibious assault ships and fighter aircraft deployed across the eastern Mediterranean and Gulf region.

French Rafale fighter jets stationed in the United Arab Emirates have already intercepted drones and missiles over Gulf airspace since fighting erupted. France maintains long-standing defense agreements with Gulf nations including the United Arab Emirates, Qatar and Kuwait.

Reuters earlier quoted Macron saying France must protect its economic interests as the conflict threatens energy supplies and international trade routes.

“We have economic interests to protect because oil prices, gas prices and international trade are being profoundly disrupted by this war,” Macron said during a televised address.

The growing European naval discussions come as the United States pauses its own controversial maritime effort known as “Project Freedom.” President Trump suspended the operation earlier this week after limited commercial participation and rising fears of direct confrontation with Iran.

Unlike the American-led approach, European officials are presenting the proposed French-British initiative as a neutral maritime security effort rather than an enforcement operation.

Still, analysts say the mission carries enormous geopolitical risks.

The Strait of Hormuz remains one of the world’s most strategically sensitive chokepoints. Even temporary disruptions there can trigger major spikes in fuel costs, shipping insurance premiums and global inflation pressures. Since the outbreak of the war, war-risk insurance rates for vessels entering the area have reportedly surged several times above normal levels.

Industry experts say many shipping companies remain unwilling to use the route despite military escorts because of fears of missile strikes, drone attacks or naval mines.

The International Energy Agency has described the current disruption as one of the largest shocks ever experienced in global energy supply chains. Hundreds of commercial vessels remain stranded or delayed in Gulf waters, creating mounting economic pressure across Asia, Europe and North America.

The crisis has also exposed divisions among Western allies over how to respond.

While the United States has pursued aggressive military pressure against Tehran, France and Britain appear to be seeking a narrower role focused on protecting trade and preventing broader regional collapse. European governments are particularly concerned about the economic fallout of prolonged instability in the Gulf, especially as many countries continue struggling with inflation and energy security challenges.

Macron’s approach reflects France’s broader effort to position itself as both a military power and diplomatic intermediary. Paris has repeatedly argued that military escalation alone will not solve the crisis and has continued pushing for renewed talks involving Iran, the United States and European powers.

At the same time, France has increased security measures at home and accelerated evacuation assistance for citizens leaving the Middle East.

The deployment of the Charles de Gaulle carrier group also sends a wider message about Europe’s strategic ambitions. Defense analysts say France and Britain increasingly want to demonstrate that Europe can independently secure major international trade routes without relying entirely on American leadership.

That ambition has gained momentum since the outbreak of the Iran conflict and amid wider uncertainty surrounding global security alliances.

Whether the European mission ultimately moves into the Strait of Hormuz may depend less on military readiness and more on diplomacy. For now, the carrier group’s movement signals that Europe is preparing for a longer and potentially more dangerous confrontation in one of the world’s most economically vital regions.

Sources: Reuters, The Associated Press.

US Strikes Iranian Oil Tanker as Trump Presses Tehran to Accept War Deal

By
admin
-
0

(AP) — The United States military struck an Iranian oil tanker in the Gulf of Oman on Wednesday as pressure mounted on Tehran to accept a proposed agreement aimed at ending months of fighting and reopening one of the world’s most important shipping routes.

U.S. Central Command said an American fighter jet disabled the tanker after it attempted to break through a blockade near Iranian ports. Military officials said the vessel’s steering system was targeted, leaving the ship unable to continue its movement.

The strike came despite an uneasy ceasefire currently in place between Washington and Tehran, underscoring how fragile the situation remains.

President Donald Trump warned that the conflict could quickly intensify again if Iran refuses terms being discussed behind closed doors.

“If they don’t agree, the bombing starts,” Trump wrote on social media Wednesday, signaling that military action could resume on a larger scale if negotiations fail.

The White House has not publicly released details of the proposed framework, but several media outlets said discussions include reopening the Strait of Hormuz, easing sanctions on Iran, releasing frozen Iranian funds and limiting uranium enrichment activities.

Iran has not accepted the proposal. Officials in Tehran said parts of the framework had already been rejected, though negotiations remain under review.

The latest military action unfolded as hundreds of cargo vessels and oil tankers remain trapped in the Persian Gulf due to Iran’s restrictions on passage through the Strait of Hormuz. The narrow waterway handles a major share of global oil and natural gas shipments and is considered one of the world’s most sensitive trade routes.

The conflict has disrupted energy markets for weeks, driving up fuel prices and straining supply chains across several regions.

Shipping companies say the financial impact is already severe.

German shipping giant Hapag-Lloyd said the closure of the strait is costing the company roughly $60 million each week due to rising insurance rates, longer routes and higher fuel expenses. Other major shipping operators have also slowed or suspended movement through the area.

A vessel operated by French shipping company CMA CGM was damaged Tuesday while attempting to pass through the strait. Several crew members were injured in the attack and later received medical treatment, the company said.

Industry analysts say global trade may remain unstable until commercial ships can move safely again.

“Shipping companies and energy traders are still operating under enormous uncertainty,” said Kaho Yu of risk analysis firm Verisk Maplecroft. “The market will remain nervous until there is clear evidence the situation is stabilizing.”

Oil prices eased slightly Wednesday after surging earlier in the week. Brent crude fell back to around $100 per barrel, though prices remain far above levels seen before the conflict began.

Meanwhile, tensions expanded beyond the Gulf region.

Israel carried out an airstrike in southern Beirut on Wednesday, marking the first attack on the Lebanese capital’s suburbs since last month’s ceasefire with the Hezbollah group. Israeli officials said the operation targeted a senior commander tied to Hezbollah’s Radwan Force.

The strike raised fears that the broader conflict could spill further across the region despite ongoing diplomatic efforts.

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi traveled to China on Wednesday for talks focused on the war, sanctions and the shipping crisis. China, one of Iran’s closest economic partners, called for a broader ceasefire and urged all sides to avoid renewed fighting.

Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi said the conflict had caused “serious losses” and damaged regional stability.

China’s role has become increasingly important because of its strong economic ties with Tehran. The Trump administration is pushing Beijing to use its influence to persuade Iran to reopen the Strait of Hormuz and move toward a settlement.

Trump is expected to travel to Beijing later this month for a summit with Chinese President Xi Jinping, adding another diplomatic layer to the crisis.

Iran, however, continues to resist outside pressure.

Senior Iranian officials repeated Wednesday that Tehran would not back away from its position regarding control of the strait. Iranian leaders argue that the waterway remains under their security oversight, though international maritime law guarantees freedom of navigation.

The United States has warned shipping companies not to pay any fees or tolls demanded by Iran for safe passage.

The latest strike on the tanker shows how quickly the ceasefire between Washington and Tehran could collapse.

Although both sides are publicly discussing diplomacy, military pressure remains at the center of negotiations. Trump’s strategy appears designed to force Iran into accepting terms through economic and military leverage rather than prolonged talks.

Any wider disruption in the Strait of Hormuz could send energy prices sharply higher again and deepen pressure on economies already struggling with inflation and supply shortages. Countries heavily dependent on imported fuel, especially in Asia and Europe, could face immediate economic strain.

There is also growing concern among shipping companies and insurers. Many firms now see the Gulf region as too dangerous for normal commercial activity. If the situation worsens, some carriers may permanently shift trade routes, adding long-term costs to global shipping.

Iran’s position also reflects domestic pressure inside the country. Tehran views control of the strait as one of its strongest bargaining tools. Backing down without securing major concessions could be seen internally as a political defeat.

At the same time, Trump faces pressure at home to avoid another prolonged conflict in the Middle East while still appearing tough on Iran.

That leaves both governments trying to project strength while quietly exploring a possible exit from the crisis.

For now, the ceasefire is still holding. But Wednesday’s strike made clear that the line between diplomacy and renewed war remains dangerously thin.

Australia Prepares Charges as Women With ISIS-Extremist Links Return From Syria

By
admin
-
0

 (AP/DW) — Australian authorities are preparing to arrest and investigate several women with alleged ties to the extremist group known as Islamic State as they return home from Syria with children, officials said Wednesday.

Four women and nine children are expected to arrive in Australia after leaving a detention camp in northeastern Syria. The group had been living in Roj camp, a site that has held relatives of suspected fighters since the collapse of the group’s territorial control in 2019.

Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke said the government was alerted when travel bookings were made for the group. He made clear that officials would not assist their return beyond what is required by law.

“The decisions they made were serious and deeply troubling,” Burke said. “The government’s position reflects that.”

Police confirmed that some of the returning women could be taken into custody upon arrival. Others may face ongoing investigations tied to possible offenses under Australian law.

Australian Federal Police Commissioner Krissy Barrett said authorities have spent years gathering evidence linked to citizens who traveled to conflict zones during the height of the group’s influence.

“Some individuals will be arrested and charged. Others will remain under active investigation,” Barrett said.

She added that investigators have examined potential crimes including involvement in extremist activities and other serious offenses committed while abroad.

The children traveling with the women will not face charges. Instead, officials say they will be placed into support and reintegration programs designed to help them adjust to life in Australia.

The group’s return follows years of debate over how to handle citizens who left the country to join or support extremist movements. Between 2012 and 2016, a number of Australians traveled to Syria, many joining family members who had aligned themselves with militant groups.

After the collapse of the group’s so-called state, thousands of foreign nationals — including women and children — were held in camps across the region. Some countries moved quickly to bring their citizens home. Others, including Australia, took a more cautious approach.

Burke said the government has limited power to block citizens from returning.

“There are strict legal limits on stopping someone from coming back to their own country,” he said.

Australia has, in rare cases, used temporary exclusion orders to delay the return of individuals considered high risk. One such order remains in place for a woman who was blocked from returning earlier this year.

A larger group of women and children had attempted to leave the same camp in February but was stopped by Syrian authorities. That effort did not move forward.

Officials say law enforcement and intelligence agencies have long prepared for these scenarios. Contingency plans have been in place for more than a decade, reflecting concerns about the risks posed by returning individuals with possible ties to extremist groups.

At the same time, authorities face pressure to balance security concerns with legal obligations. Australian law requires the government to issue travel documents to citizens, even when they are under investigation.

Police say their focus remains on accountability.

“The individuals involved made choices that may have violated Australian law,” Barrett said. “Our job is to assess the evidence and act accordingly.”

The return of citizens linked to extremist groups continues to challenge governments around the world. It is not just a legal issue. It is also a test of how countries handle security risks while upholding basic rights.

Australia’s approach shows that tension clearly. On one hand, officials have drawn a hard line, refusing to assist with repatriation efforts. On the other, they cannot fully block citizens from coming home.

That creates a situation where authorities must prepare for arrivals they did not organize and may not fully control.

The presence of children adds another layer. Many of them were taken to conflict zones at a young age or were born there. They are not seen as responsible for the actions of adults, yet they often carry the trauma of war and displacement.

Reintegration programs aim to address that, but success is not guaranteed. Experts say long-term support is critical to help children rebuild stable lives and avoid future risks.

There is also the question of evidence. Crimes tied to conflict zones can be difficult to prove in court. Investigators often rely on intelligence gathered overseas, which may not always meet the standards required for prosecution.

That means some individuals could return without facing immediate charges, even if suspicions remain.

At a broader level, the situation reflects the lasting impact of the conflict in Syria and Iraq. Even years after the collapse of the extremist group’s territory, its effects continue to reach far beyond the region.

For Australia, the challenge now shifts from prevention to management. Authorities must track, investigate and, where necessary, prosecute those returning, while also ensuring community safety.

The outcome of these cases could shape how the country handles similar situations in the future.

For now, officials say they are ready.

Investigations will continue as the group arrives, with law enforcement monitoring each step closely.

Teen Dies After Mass Shooting at Oklahoma Lake Party; Dozens Injured as Police Hunt Suspects

By
admin
-
0

An 18-year-old woman has died after a weekend shooting at a crowded lakeside gathering in Oklahoma, where a fight erupted into gunfire that left more than 20 others injured, authorities said Tuesday.

Police in Edmond confirmed the victim died from her injuries just before 6 p.m. Tuesday after days in critical condition. Her name has not been released at the request of her family.

The violence unfolded Sunday night near Arcadia Lake, a popular spot for boating and outdoor recreation just north of Oklahoma City. Officers were already on their way to the area to respond to a noise complaint tied to a large gathering when reports of gunfire began to come in.

By the time officers arrived, dozens of people were scattered across the park, and at least 23 individuals had suffered injuries linked to gunfire. Authorities said the wounds ranged from minor grazes to more serious injuries caused by bullets and fragments.

Investigators say the shooting began after an argument broke out among people at the gathering. The event had drawn a large crowd of mostly young adults and had been promoted across social media, police said. The gathering was not approved or scheduled through the city.

Sgt. James Hamm, a spokesperson for Edmond police, said the situation escalated quickly.

“What started as a dispute turned into a chaotic scene,” Hamm said. “Many of those hurt were not involved in the conflict. They were simply there when the shooting began.”

No arrests have been made. Police have not said how many people may have fired weapons or what types of firearms were used. Officials say they are following several leads but are withholding details to protect the investigation.

Authorities also stressed that they do not believe there is an ongoing threat to the public.

Hospitals across the Oklahoma City area treated a large number of victims in the hours after the shooting. Integris Health said it received multiple patients, with some treated and released and others transferred for more advanced care. OU Health confirmed that its trauma center also treated several victims.

Medical officials said those injured ranged in age from teenagers to adults in their late 20s. As of Tuesday afternoon, one patient remained in critical condition, while others were listed in fair to good condition.

Some victims were taken to hospitals outside the immediate area, and their conditions have not been made public.

Witnesses described a festive atmosphere before the violence. People had gathered to eat, listen to music and socialize. That changed quickly when an argument broke out.

Jeremiah Braxton, who attended the party, said the mood shifted in seconds.

“Everyone was having a good time,” he said. “Then an argument started, and it just spiraled. After that, everything turned into chaos.”

City leaders said there were no officers assigned to patrol the lake at the time of the gathering. Edmond Mayor Mark Nash said the area is not staffed around the clock and that events held there typically require a reservation through the city’s parks department. No such reservation had been made for Sunday night.

The city has begun reviewing how large gatherings at public spaces are managed, including whether additional oversight or enforcement is needed.

The shooting at Arcadia Lake reflects a pattern seen in recent years, where large, informal gatherings organized online draw crowds that can be difficult to manage. Without clear oversight or security, small disputes can escalate quickly, especially when firearms are present.

Social media has made it easier to organize events at short notice. While that can bring people together, it also creates challenges for local authorities. Crowds can swell beyond expectations, and law enforcement may not have advance notice to prepare.

Public spaces like parks and lakes are particularly vulnerable in these situations. They are open, accessible and often lack the controlled entry points found at private venues. That makes it harder to monitor who is coming in and what they may be carrying.

The number of people injured in this case also highlights the risk to bystanders. Police said many of those hurt were not involved in the initial dispute. That detail underscores how quickly violence can spread in crowded settings.

There is also a broader concern about youth gatherings and safety. Many of those present were young adults, and some were still in high school. Incidents like this raise questions about supervision, awareness and how communities can better prevent violence before it starts.

Local officials now face pressure to strike a balance between keeping public spaces open and ensuring they are safe. That could include tighter rules for large gatherings, increased patrols during peak seasons, or closer monitoring of events promoted online.

For now, investigators remain focused on identifying those responsible. Police are urging anyone with information, photos or video from the scene to come forward as they work to piece together what happened.

The case remains active, with authorities continuing to track leads and gather evidence.

kOCO/AP

1...151617...955Page 16 of 955